1:24-cv-10915
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-16 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 2026-04-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Quick-Home Store by Qin Zhuang |
| 2026-02-26 | MAILED Trademark report with certified copy of minute order dated 2/25/2026 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2026-02-25 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/25/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant Quick Home Store has not objected to Plaintiff's motion for entry of a default judgment 71 or responded to this court's order to respond to the motion 74. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b), the court hereby enters a default judgment against Defendant Quick Home Store, the sole remaining defendant in this case. Enter default judgment. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-11 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Anagram International, LLC |
| 2026-02-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's motion for default judgment, 71. Defendant Quick-Home Store has until 2/18/2026 to respond to the motion. If no response is filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff should serve this order on defendant. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-09 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment, 71 |
| 2026-02-09 | MEMORANDUM by Anagram International, LLC in support of motion for default judgment, 71 |
| 2026-02-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendant Identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 2026-02-05 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant Quick-Home Store, identified on Amended Schedule A [57-1], has not objected to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default 60 or responded to this court's order to respond to the motion 68. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), the court hereby enters default against defendant Quick-Home Store. By 2/11/26, plaintiff should file an appropriate motion or a status report; if defendant has appeared, the parties should file a joint status report by that date. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-01-23 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Anagram International, LLC |
| 2026-01-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 67, is granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Vesely v. Armslist LLC, 762 F.3d 661, 666 (7th Cir. 2014) (stating that Rule 59(e) motions may be granted due to "a manifest error of law or fact" (quotation omitted)). The court concludes that defendant established sufficient minimum contacts with Illinois such that the court's exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant complied with constitutional due process. Specifically, defendant confirmed plaintiff's order and agreed to ship its product to an address in Illinois. [64-1]; see NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 624 (7th Cir. 2022) (holding that defendant had purposefully availed itself of the Illinois market by inter alia "establish[ing] an online store" through which it "unequivocally asserted a willingness to ship goods to Illinois" and confirmed orders for shipment to Illinois); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 478 |
| 2026-01-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC for reconsideration Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Order of December 11, 2025 [Dkt. No. 65] |
| 2025-12-11 | ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-12-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed plaintiff's memorandum, 64, in response to the court's order, 63, for plaintiff to explain the basis of personal jurisdiction over defendant listed in Second Amended Schedule A, [57-1]. That order instructed plaintiff that the Seventh Circuit has found personal jurisdiction when "the defendant has shipped the allegedly infringing products to the forum state." 63 (emphasis added); see, e.g., NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 622-23 (7th Cir. 2022); Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 399 (7th Cir. 2020); Illinois v. Hemi Group, LLC, 622 F.3d 754, 758 (7th Cir. 2010). While plaintiff presented evidence that defendant sold an item for shipment to an address in Illinois, 64 at 4; [64-1], plaintiff offered no evidence that the item actually shipped. "The mere existence of a contract between an out-of-state defendant and an in-state plaintiff is insufficient, by itself, to justify personal jurisdict |
| 2025-12-09 | RESPONSE by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Memorandum in Response to Order of November 14, 2025 [Dkt. No. 63] |
| 2025-11-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed plaintiff's motion for default judgment, 60. Entering default requires the court to have personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Swaim v. Moltan Co., 73 F.3d 711, 716 (7th Cir. 1996). By 12/9/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for want of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff has not adequately established personal jurisdiction. The Seventh Circuit has, in some cases, found the existence of specific personal jurisdiction in trademark, copyright, and patent infringement suits against online retailers, but only when the defendant has shipped the allegedly infringing products to the forum state. See, e.g., NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 622-23 (7th Cir. 2022). Absent fulfillment and shipment of an order into the forum state, the operation of an "interactive" online storefront is insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. See Advanced Tactical Ordnance Sys., |
| 2025-10-16 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 60 |
| 2025-10-16 | MEMORANDUM by Anagram International, LLC in support of motion for default judgment 60 |
| 2025-10-16 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendants Identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-09-24 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Anagram International, LLC |
| 2025-09-24 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anagram International, LLC as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto on 9/23/2025, answer due 10/14/2025. |
| 2025-08-06 | Second Amended Complaint AMENDED complaint by Anagram International, LLC against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-07-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's memorandum regarding joinder. 55. Having considered the memorandum and plaintiff's other filings in this case, the court finds that joinder of the defendants identified in plaintiff's Schedule A, 54, is improper. Rule 20 allows a plaintiff to join multiple defendants in an action where (1) "any right to relief is asserted against [the defendants] jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences" and (2) "any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action." Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Here, plaintiff's arguments in support of joinder are unpersuasive for the reasons stated in Hong Kong Leyuzhen Tech. Co. Ltd. v. Schedule A, No. 25-cv-4947, Dkt. 21 (N.D. Ill. June 3, 2025) and CAO Grp., Inc. v. Schedule A, No. 25-cv-4054, Dkt. 21 (N.D. Ill. May 16, 2025). To cure this deficienc |
| 2025-06-09 | MEMORANDUM by Anagram International, LLC Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Joinder |
| 2025-06-09 | by Anagram International, LLC Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-06-09 | AMENDED complaint by Anagram International, LLC against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-06-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's memorandum, 51, in response to this court's joinder show-cause order. 50. Plaintiff's request to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants and an accompanying supplemental memorandum is granted. By 6/9/2025, plaintiff should file an amended complaint and an accompanying supplemental memorandum explaining why the defendants should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. |
| 2025-05-29 | MEMORANDUM by Anagram International, LLC Memorandum in Response to Order of May 1, 2025 [Dkt. No. 11] |
| 2025-05-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 5/29/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the sep |
| 2025-05-13 | STATUS Report by Anagram International, LLC |
| 2025-04-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 5/13/2025, plaintiff should file a status report with an update on the status of the case. |
| 2025-04-14 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/14/2025: |
| 2025-04-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's amended motion for expedited discovery, 43, is granted. Enter order. |
| 2025-04-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to vacate, 44, is granted. The court's expedited discovery order, 40, includes the wrong list of defendants. Compare 40, with 8. The court's previous order, 40, is vacated. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(a). |
| 2025-04-10 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC to vacate Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate |
| 2025-04-10 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Amended Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-03-28 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-03-26 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/26/2025: |
| 2025-03-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery, 37, is granted in part and denied in part. Enter Order. |
| 2025-03-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, 36, is denied as moot. The court has already granted the motion for electronic service of process. 33. |
| 2025-03-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-03-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 2025-02-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to unseal Docket Nos. 8 and 13-28, 34, is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28. |
| 2025-01-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Plaintiff's Motion to Direct the Clerk of the Court to Unseal Docket Nos. 8 and 13-28 |
| 2025-01-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages, 10, is granted. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, 7, is denied. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process, 11, is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. See 7. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1 |
| 2024-12-27 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2024-11-19 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Anagram International, LLC Supplemental Notification of Affiliates |
| 2024-10-24 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 2024-10-23 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Anagram International, LLC |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Sealed Schedule A |
| 2024-10-23 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Anagram International, LLC |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 16 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 15 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 14 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 13 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 12 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 11 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 10 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 9 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 8 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 7 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 6 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 5 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 4 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 3 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 2 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC Exhibit 3 Part 1 of Wiles Declaration |
| 2024-10-23 | MEMORANDUM by Anagram International, LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 11 |
| 2024-10-23 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 2024-10-23 | MOTION by Plaintiff Anagram International, LLC for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
