1:25-cv-00630
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-02-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Pursuant to the Notice of Dismissal 29, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-02-07 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Dyson Technology Limited as to Defendant huayueecomme |
| 2025-02-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: In light of the order entered on 1/30/2025 [27], the Clerk is directed to unseal docket entries [2],[3],[14],[15] and [21]. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-01-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Motion hearing held. The plaintiff's ex parte motion for temporary restraining order 17 is denied. The plaintiff contends that it "has submitted extensive documentation that Defendants make, use, offer for sale, sell, and/or import into the United States for subsequent sale or use the same product, namely, that infringes directly and/or directly the Dyson Designs. The documentation submitted by Plaintiff show that an ordinary observer would be deceived into thinking that the Infringing Product was the same as the Dyson Designs." That "extensive documentation" consists of the asserted patent and a screen shot of the accused product. At no point does the plaintiff provide any analysis to explain why an ordinary observer would find the accused product to be substantially the same as the patented design. Nor is there any attempt to highlight the similarities between the two. Perhaps because there are few, if any, non-functional claimed fe |
| 2025-01-29 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Jennifer Van Nacht |
| 2025-01-24 | NOTICE of Motion by Justin R. Gaudio for presentment of motion for leave to file 4, motion for miscellaneous relief 22, motion for temporary restraining order 17 before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 1/30/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
| 2025-01-24 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 23 |
| 2025-01-24 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 22 |
| 2025-01-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 2025-01-24 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 2 - Part 1 regarding declaration 20 |
| 2025-01-24 | DECLARATION of Giles Samuel Lane regarding memorandum in support of motion 18 |
| 2025-01-24 | DECLARATION of Justin R. Gaudio regarding memorandum in support of motion 18 |
| 2025-01-24 | MEMORANDUM by Dyson Technology Limited in support of motion for temporary restraining order 17 |
| 2025-01-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for temporary restraining order including a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-01-23 | MAILED patent report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-01-23 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 - Part 1 regarding amended complaint[13] |
| 2025-01-23 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Amended Schedule A regarding amended complaint[13] |
| 2025-01-23 | AMENDED complaint by Dyson Technology Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 2025-01-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 163 defendants. (R. 1 and R. 2.) This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder on or before February 5, 2025. Alternatively, by the same date, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint naming one or more defendants; however, if the plaintiff names multiple defendants, the plaintiff must show that joinder of those defendants is proper. All pending motions are hereby stay |
| 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Lawrence J. Crain |
| 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin R. Gaudio |
| 2025-01-17 | Notice of Claims involving Patents by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 2025-01-17 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Dyson Technology Limited |
| 2025-01-17 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-01-17 | MOTION by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited for leave to file under seal |
| 2025-01-17 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Exhibit 1 regarding complaint 1 |
| 2025-01-17 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited Schedule A regarding complaint 1 |
| 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Andrew Daniel Burnham |
| 2025-01-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited by Justin Tyler Joseph |
| 2025-01-17 | COMPLAINT filed by Dyson Technology Limited; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22971548. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
