1:25-cv-04645
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-02-26 | MAILED Copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 2/25/2026 to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2026-02-25 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/25/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant Duan Shiqi has not objected to Plaintiff's motion for entry of a default judgment 47 or responded to this court's order to respond to the motion 50. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b), the court hereby enters a default judgment against Defendant Duan Shiqi, the sole remaining defendant in this case. Enter default judgment. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-11 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Art Ask Agency |
| 2026-02-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's motion for default judgment, 47. Defendant Duan Shiqi has until 2/18/2026 to respond to the motion. If no response is filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff should serve this order on defendant. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-09 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 47 |
| 2026-02-09 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency in support of motion for default judgment 47 |
| 2026-02-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendant Identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 2026-02-05 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant Duan Shiqi, identified on Amended Schedule A 21, has not objected to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default 35 or responded to this court's order to respond to the motion 44. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), the court hereby enters default against defendant Duan Shiqi. By 2/11/26, plaintiff should file an appropriate motion or a status report; if defendant has appeared, the parties should file a joint status report by that date. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-01-23 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Art Ask Agency |
| 2026-01-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, 43, is granted. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e); Vesely v. Armslist LLC, 762 F.3d 661, 666 (7th Cir. 2014) (stating that Rule 59(e) motions may be granted due to "a manifest error of law or fact" (quotation omitted)). The court concludes that defendant established sufficient minimum contacts with Illinois such that the court's exercise of personal jurisdiction over defendant complied with constitutional due process. Specifically, defendant confirmed plaintiff's order and agreed to ship its product to an address in Illinois. [43-1]; see NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 624 (7th Cir. 2022) (holding that defendant had purposefully availed itself of the Illinois market by inter alia "establish[ing] an online store" through which it "unequivocally asserted a willingness to ship goods to Illinois" and confirmed orders for shipment to Illinois); see also Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 478 |
| 2025-12-12 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for reconsideration Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of the Order of November 14, 2025 [Dkt. No. 40] |
| 2025-11-17 | MAILED Copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 11/14/2025 to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-11-14 | ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed on 11/14/2025: |
| 2025-11-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has reviewed plaintiff's memorandum, 39, in response to the court's order, 38, for plaintiff to explain the basis of personal jurisdiction over defendant listed in Amended Schedule A, 21. That order instructed plaintiff that "[a]bsent fulfillment and shipment of an order into the forum state, the operation of an 'interactive' online storefront is insufficient to establish personal jurisdiction." Id. (emphasis added); see, e.g., NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 622-23 (7th Cir. 2022); Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 399 (7th Cir. 2020); Illinois v. Hemi Group, LLC, 622 F.3d 754, 758 (7th Cir. 2010). While plaintiff presented evidence that defendant sold an item for shipment to an address in Illinois, 39 at 3, plaintiff offered no evidence that the item actually shipped. "The mere existence of a contract between an out-of-state defendant and an in-state plaintiff is insufficient, by itself, to justify p |
| 2025-08-22 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency Plaintiff's Memorandum in Response to the August 7, 2025 Order [Dkt. No. 38] |
| 2025-08-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a supplemental brief (not to exceed 10 pages) by 8/22/2025, explaining the basis for personal jurisdiction over defendant. On 8/5/2025, plaintiff moved for entry of default and default judgment against defendant. 35. "Before a court can enter a default judgment, however, it must be satisfied that it has personal jurisdiction over the defendants." Simonsen v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, No. 01 C 3081, 2002 WL 230777, at *15 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 2002) (citation omitted). That is because "this Court cannot enter a default judgment against a party over whom it lacks personal jurisdiction." Pardo v. Mecum Auction, Inc., No. 12 C 08410, 2014 WL 627690, at *8 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 18, 2014); see also Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Does 1-55, No. 11-cv-10, 2011 WL 2036454, at *2 (N.D. Ill. May 24, 2011) ("To enter a default judgment against one or more of the Defendants, the Court must have personal jurisdiction." (citin |
| 2025-08-05 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 35 |
| 2025-08-05 | MEMORANDUM by Art Ask Agency in support of motion for default judgment 35 |
| 2025-08-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendants Identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-07-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's status report. 32. By 8/4/2025, plaintiff should file a status report with an update on the case. |
| 2025-07-14 | STATUS Report by Art Ask Agency |
| 2025-07-14 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Art Ask Agency |
| 2025-07-14 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by Elizabeth Aubree Miller |
| 2025-07-09 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Duan Shiqi identified in the Amended Complaint |
| 2025-06-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's status report. 26. The 6/23/2025 status report deadline, 24, is stricken. By 7/15/2025, plaintiff should file a status report with an update on the status of the case. |
| 2025-06-20 | STATUS Report by Art Ask Agency |
| 2025-06-02 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/2/2025: |
| 2025-06-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery 23 is granted in part and denied in part. Enter Order. By 6/23/2025, plaintiff should file a status report with an update on the status of the case. |
| 2025-05-29 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-05-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Telephone status hearing held on 5/23/2025. Plaintiff is directed to file a joint status report by 6/20/2025 updating the court on how plaintiff seeks to proceed with this litigation. The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal document 21. |
| 2025-05-22 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-05-22 | AMENDED complaint by Art Ask Agency against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-05-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's memorandum, 18, in response to this court's joinder show-cause order. 11. Plaintiff's request to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants and an accompanying supplemental memorandum is granted. By 5/23/2025, plaintiff should file an amended complaint and an accompanying supplemental memorandum explaining why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Telephone status hearing set for 5/23/2025 at 8:45 a.m. To join the telephone hearing please dial 650-479-3207 and enter access code 2315 996 7380#. Press # when prompted for an attendee number. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings. Violation of these prohibitions may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of ent |
| 2025-05-15 | RESPONSE by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Memorandum in Response to Order of May 1, 2025 [Dkt. No. 11] |
| 2025-05-08 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 4 to Strid Declaration regarding declaration 13 |
| 2025-05-08 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 3 to Strid Declaration regarding declaration 13 |
| 2025-05-08 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 2 to Strid Declaration regarding declaration 13 |
| 2025-05-08 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Exhibit 2 Part 1 to Strid Declaration regarding declaration 13 |
| 2025-05-08 | DECLARATION of Maria Strid |
| 2025-05-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, 7, is denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. Id. at 1. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ ] |
| 2025-05-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 5/15/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the sep |
| 2025-04-29 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Art Ask Agency |
| 2025-04-29 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency Sealed Schedule A |
| 2025-04-29 | MOTION by Plaintiff Art Ask Agency to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2025-04-29 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by John Wilson |
| 2025-04-29 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 2025-04-29 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 2025-04-29 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Art Ask Agency by Michael A. Hierl |
| 2025-04-29 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-04-29 | COMPLAINT filed by Art Ask Agency; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23411257. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
