1:25-cv-04947
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-02-03 | FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/3/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Motion hearing held on 2/3/2026 regarding Plaintiff's motion for default judgment [36]. Despite proper service, the Defendant failed to appear in response to the complaint, to object to the motion for default, or otherwise. The motion [36] is granted for the reasons stated on the record. Enter Final Default Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-01-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court previously entered default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) against defendant [35] for the failure to file appropriate pleadings, and for the failure to show cause as to why default should not be entered. The court previously denied a motion by plaintiff for default judgment as premature, see [34], but granted leave to re-file, see [35]. Plaintiff re-filed, see [36], and the court gave defendant until 1/9 to file a response, see [35]. Defendant, again, failed to comply with the court's deadline. The court is thus inclined to find that a default judgment is appropriate. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Status hearing set for 2/3/2026 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 2325. At the hearing, plaintiff should be prepared to discuss the propriety of a permanent injunction under the factors enumerated in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C., 547 U.S. 388, 391 (2006). Mailed notice. |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-12-16 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for default judgment as to Defendant Shenzhen Yilanya Technology Co., Ltd |
| 2025-12-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant has not objected to plaintiff's motion for entry of a default [29] or responded to this court's order to show cause as to why default should not be entered [34]. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), the court hereby enters a finding of default against Defendant. By 12/17/25, plaintiff may refile its motion for default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b). Defendant has until 1/9/26 to file a response. Defendant is warned that further failure to respond will result in a default judgment. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-11-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment, [29], is denied as premature. Defendant is ordered to show cause as to why default should not be entered by 11/21/2025 or will face a finding of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). |
| 2025-09-24 | SUPPLEMENT to text entry, [31] on Personal Jurisdiction in Compliance with Docket 31 |
| 2025-09-18 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, [30] in Compliance with Docket 30 |
| 2025-09-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a supplemental brief (not to exceed 10 pages) by 9/24/2025, explaining the basis for personal jurisdiction over defendant. On 9/15/2025, plaintiff moved for entry of default and default judgment against defendant. [29]. "Before a court can enter a default judgment, however, it must be satisfied that it has personal jurisdiction over the defendants." Simonsen v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, No. 01 C 3081, 2002 WL 230777, at *15 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 14, 2002) (citation omitted). That is because "this Court cannot enter a default judgment against a party over whom it lacks personal jurisdiction." Pardo v. Mecum Auction, Inc., No. 12 C 08410, 2014 WL 627690, at *8 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 18, 2014); see also Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. Does 1-55, No. 11-cv-10, 2011 WL 2036454, at *2 (N.D. Ill. May 24, 2011) ("To enter a default judgment against one or more of the Defendants, the Court must have personal jurisdiction." (ci |
| 2025-09-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment, [29]. If defendant objects to the entry of default judgment, it shall file a response by 9/24/2025. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on defendant. |
| 2025-09-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for default judgment as to Defendant Shenzhen Yilanya Technology Co., Ltd |
| 2025-08-21 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to Shenzhen Yilanya Technology Co. Ltd. on 8/21/2025, answer due 9/11/2025. |
| 2025-08-07 | EXPEDITED DISCOVERY ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 8/7/2025: |
| 2025-08-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order and for expedited discovery, [23], is granted in part and denied in part. First, the motion is denied insofar as it seeks a temporary restraining order. Plaintiff seeks entry of an ex parte temporary restraining order. However, his attorney has not "certifie[d] in writing any efforts made to give notice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the court will not enter an ex parte temporary restraining order. Second, the motion is granted insofar as it seeks expedited discovery. Enter order. |
| 2025-07-07 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Shenzhen Yilanya Technology Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-07-03 | [封存] SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) Shenzhen Yilanya Technology Co., Ltd. by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2025-07-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order and Expedited Discovery RENEWED |
| 2025-06-17 | FIRST AMENDED complaint by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited against Shenzhen Yilanya Technology Co. Ltd. and terminating The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-06-03 | ORDER re Misjoinder Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 6/3/2025: Plaintiff has until 6/17/2025, to file an amended complaint narrowing the claims down to a subset of defendants that are properly joined. |
| 2025-05-23 | RESPONSE to Order to Show Cause to text entry, [16] |
| 2025-05-15 | AMENDED complaint by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-05-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, [12], is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. To the extent that the motion requests service of process of any temporary restraining order in this case, service is not necessary because this court has already denied the motion for a TRO. [17]. |
| 2025-05-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal, [4], and for a temporary restraining order and for expedited discovery, [14] are denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. See [14]. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-15 |
| 2025-05-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 5/24/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the sep |
| 2025-05-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, [4], is denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. Id. at 1. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ |
| 2025-05-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-05-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for leave to file excess pages for Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2025-05-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication and Electronic Service |
| 2025-05-06 | [封存] MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-05-05 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu |
| 2025-05-05 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter |
| 2025-05-05 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn |
| 2025-05-05 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2025-05-05 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn regarding MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal [4] |
| 2025-05-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal |
| 2025-05-05 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-05-05 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Exhibit 1 to the Complaint regarding complaint, [1] |
| 2025-05-05 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Gokalp Bayramoglu |
| 2025-05-05 | COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement filed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23442146. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
