1:25-cv-06555
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-10-22 | MAILED Trademark report with certified copy of minute order dated 10/21/2025 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-10-21 | DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/21/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-10-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Defendant Ashylly has not responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 35 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of Plaintiff's marks irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. Because this infringement was willful and considering the value of Plaintiff's brand as well as the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $15,000.00 is an appropriate award of statutory damages against Defendant Ashylly. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-08-28 | STATUS Report by Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-08-28 | CERTIFICATE of Service by William Benjamin Kalbac on behalf of Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-08-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for default and default judgment 35 is granted in part as to the request for entry of default. Plaintiff has shown that Defendant Ashylly was served on 7/28/25 and failed to plead or otherwise defend this action by 8/18/25 32. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), default is entered against Defendant Ashylly. Plaintiff's motion is entered and continued as to the request for entry of a default judgment. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment are due by 9/3/25. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this order on defaulted Defendant within one business day of entry and promptly file proof of such service. The motion hearing set for 9/2/25 38 is stricken. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-08-26 | NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for default judgment 35 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 9/2/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-08-26 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 35 |
| 2025-08-26 | MEMORANDUM by Toho Co. Ltd. in support of motion for default judgment 35 |
| 2025-08-26 | MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. for default judgment as to Defendant No. 58 |
| 2025-08-26 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-07-28 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-07-28 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Toho Co. Ltd. as to Ashylly on 7/28/2025, answer due 8/18/2025. |
| 2025-07-28 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Ashylly |
| 2025-07-25 | ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 7/25/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-07-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's renewed motion for electronic service 24 is granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with online marketplace defendants. Enter Order Authorizing Electronic Service of Process. Motion hearing set for 7/31/25 26 is stricken. A status report regarding next steps is due by 8/29/25, if other appropriate relief has not been sought by that date. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-07-24 | STATUS Report by Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-07-24 | NOTICE of Motion by Elizabeth Aubree Miller for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 24 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 7/31/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-07-24 | DECLARATION of Elizabeth A. Miller |
| 2025-07-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 2025-07-03 | ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 7/3/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-07-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery 19 is granted. The Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to obtain Defendant's contact information. Enter Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) 20 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff seeks authorization to effectuate service of process by email and electronic publication but has not yet shown that it has a reliable email address at which it may reach Defendant, despite claiming in the motion that Defendant's email address is included in Exhibit 2 to the declaration of Koji Ueda (see Dkt. 20 at 2). There is no such email address included in the exhibit. Any renewed motion must include these details. The motion hearing set for 7/8/25 21 is stricken. If no other relief has been sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report by 7/24/25 updating the Court on the progress |
| 2025-07-02 | NOTICE of Motion by Michael A. Hierl for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 20, motion to expedite 19 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 7/8/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-07-01 | MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 2025-07-01 | MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-07-01 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. Exhibit 2 to Ueda Declaration |
| 2025-07-01 | DECLARATION of Koji Ueda |
| 2025-07-01 | Amended Schedule A by Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-07-01 | AMENDED complaint by Toho Co. Ltd. against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-06-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. On 6/12/25, Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a complaint 1, a motion to seal 8, and provisionally sealed Schedule A 9 naming 124 Defendants in this single case. However, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2); Viking Arm AS v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). By 7/3/25, Plaintiff must either (a) file a supplemental memorandum that refers to specific facts alleged in its filings and provides citations to specific screenshots associated with each Schedule A Defendant to demonstrate that joinder is proper; or (b) file an amended schedule A with a subset of Defendants, along with a declaration that explains how each of these defendants is properly joined with each other and in |
| 2025-06-13 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 2025-06-13 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-06-12 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. Sealed Schedule A |
| 2025-06-12 | MOTION by Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2025-06-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. by Elizabeth Aubree Miller |
| 2025-06-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. by John Wilson |
| 2025-06-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 2025-06-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 2025-06-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Toho Co. Ltd. by Michael A. Hierl |
| 2025-06-12 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-06-12 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-06-12 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Toho Co. Ltd. |
| 2025-06-12 | COMPLAINT filed by Toho Co. Ltd.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23617060. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
