1:25-cv-07242
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | EMAILED Copyright with certified copy of minute order dated 3/12/26 report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2026-03-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiffs' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, [51]. This dismissal took effect without court intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Waetzig v. Haliburton Energy Servs., 145 S. Ct. 690, 694 (2025). Plaintiff's motion for defaults judgment, [48], is stricken. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-03-11 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion |
| 2026-03-04 | CERTIFICATE of Service in compliance with Docket No. 49 by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu on behalf of Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding set deadlines, [49] |
| 2026-03-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff has moved for default judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) against defendant TICTICMISS Fashion. Defendant is ordered to show cause by 3/10/2026 as to why default judgment should not be entered or it will face default judgment. Plaintiff is directed to promptly serve this order on defendants and file a certificate of service. If defendant does not respond by the deadline above, then by 3/12/2026, plaintiff should file a status report noting the lack of response. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-25 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for default judgment as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion |
| 2026-02-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion has not objected to Plaintiff's motion for entry of a default [42] or responded to this court's order to respond to the motion [44]. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), the court hereby enters a finding of default against Defendant. Defendant is warned that further failure to respond will result in a default judgment. As a reminder, plaintiff and any appearing parties should file an updated status report by 3/11/2026. See [43]. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-23 | STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 44 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-02-13 | CERTIFICATE of Service in compliance with Docket No. 44 by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu on behalf of Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding set deadlines, [44] |
| 2026-02-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff has moved for entry of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) against defendant TICTICMISS Fashion. Defendant is ordered to show cause by 2/20/2026 as to why default should not be entered or they will face entry of default. Plaintiff is directed to promptly serve this order on defendant and file a certificate of service. If defendant does not respond by the deadline above, then by 2/23/2026, plaintiff should file a status report noting the lack of response. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received Plaintiff's Status Report [41]. Plaintiff (and any appearing parties) should file an updated status report by 3/11/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-11 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for entry of default as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion |
| 2026-02-10 | STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 33 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-01-20 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to TICTICMISS Fashion on 1/20/2026, answer due 2/10/2026. |
| 2026-01-20 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion |
| 2026-01-16 | [封存] SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) TICTICMISS Fashion by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-01-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion [36] for electronic service of process is granted. While a preferable means of service, the court is cognizant of the fact that physical service is not always possible. In this case, Plaintiff certifies that it has attempted, but has been unable, to serve process. In such a circumstance, a less preferable form of service is permissible. Service via email is "reasonably calculated" to be received by defendant, and it is thus adequate in this case. Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S 306, 319 (1950). What's more, service via email is not barred under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Thus, plaintiff may serve process via email. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-01-13 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication, Electronic Service RENEWED |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-12-11 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu |
| 2025-12-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff (and any appearing parties) should file an updated status report by 2/11/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-12-09 | STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 31 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2025-11-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 12/12/2025 updating the court on the status of the case. |
| 2025-11-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's renewed motion for service by email and electronic publication [27] is denied. Plaintiff must first attempt means of service "by any internationally agreed means. that is reasonably calculated to give notice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1); see also Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 317 (1950). If there is no internationally agreed means, Plaintiff shall attempt service by the means specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(2). If those means fail, Plaintiff may inform the court and petition this court again for permission to serve process via "other means not prohibited by international agreement." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Plaintiff's prior motion for electronic service, [19], is denied as moot. |
| 2025-11-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to conduct expedited discovery, [27], is granted subject to the following limitations. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for the Defendant, or in connection with the Defendant Internet Store, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as Amazon, (the "Third Party Providers"), shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine: the identities and locations of Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. |
| 2025-11-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to exceed page limitation, [20], is granted. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, [21], is denied. Ex parte relief is extraordinary. Plaintiff has not identified circumstances warranting such extraordinary relief. See generally Eicher Motors Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 25-CV-02937, 2025 WL 2299593 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025). |
| 2025-09-08 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication RENEWED MOTION FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS PURSUANT TO FRCP 4(f)(3) AND EXPEDITED DISCOVERY FRCP 45 |
| 2025-09-08 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant TICTICMISS Fashion |
| 2025-09-08 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) TICTICMISS Fashion by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2025-09-08 | AMENDED complaint by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited against TICTICMISS Fashion and terminating The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A |
| 2025-09-02 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to Defendant JZGPF (Defendant No. 1) |
| 2025-09-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 9/10/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the defendants in the Schedule A should not be severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship betwe |
| 2025-07-08 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for temporary restraining order and Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-07-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for leave to file excess pages IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ENTRY OF A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER |
| 2025-07-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication FOR ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS |
| 2025-07-07 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited PUBLIC amended exhibits regarding complaint, 1 |
| 2025-07-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, 4, is denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. Id. at 2-6. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ |
| 2025-06-30 | [封存] MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Katherine Kuhn |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Joseph W. Droter |
| 2025-06-27 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2025-06-27 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT |
| 2025-06-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL |
| 2025-06-27 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-06-27 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited UNREDACTED COMPLAINT AND EXHIBITS |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Gokalp Bayramoglu |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joshua Howard Sheskin for Gokalp Bayramoglu |
| 2025-06-27 | COMPLAINT filed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23684181. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
