1:25-cv-08203
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-03-13 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 3/13/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-03-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant No. 6 "Avebeauty" has not objected to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and of a default judgment 42 or responded to this court's order to respond to the motion 46. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b), the court hereby enters default and a default judgment against Defendant. Enter default judgment. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-06 | STATUS Report by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2026-01-29 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2026-01-29 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 2/5/26 Defendant No. 6 "Avebeauty" should enter an appearance and file any objection to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 42. If defendant does not appear or file an objection by that date, plaintiff should file a status report by 2/6/26 and the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff should serve this order on defendant. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-01-28 | STATUS Report by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2026-01-27 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 42 |
| 2026-01-27 | MEMORANDUM by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation in support of motion for default judgment 42 |
| 2026-01-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendants Identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 2026-01-27 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2026-01-06 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2026-01-06 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto on 1/5/2026, answer due 1/26/2026. |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-12-31 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Avebeauty |
| 2025-12-23 | ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK TO ISSUE SUMMONS: Upon consideration of Plaintiff's request, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue a single original summons in the name of "Avebeauty". The issued summons shall be used by Plaintiff for service of process in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the order previously entered by the Court authorizing service by electronic means. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 12/23/2025: Mailed notice |
| 2025-12-17 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Plaintiff's Motion to Direct the Clerk of the Court to Issue a Summons |
| 2025-12-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion 30 for electronic service of process is granted. While a preferable means of service, the court is cognizant of the fact that physical service is not always possible. In this case, Plaintiff certifies that it has attempted, but has been unable, to obtain a physical address for defendant. In such a circumstance, a less preferable form of service is permissible. Service via email is "reasonably calculated" to be received by defendant, and it is thus adequate in this case. Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S 306, 319 (1950). What's more, service via email is not barred under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Thus, plaintiff may serve process via email. By 1/29/2026, the parties should file a status report with an update on the case. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-12-11 | STATUS Report by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-12-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: In plaintiff's 12/12/2025 status report, it shall provide a copy to the court of the discovery request it sent to Temu. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-12-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 2025-11-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 12/12/2025 updating the court on the status of the case. |
| 2025-11-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to conduct expedited discovery, 25, is granted subject to the following limitations. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for the Defendant, or in connection with the Defendant Internet Store, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms, shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine: the identities and locations of Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. |
| 2025-11-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for service by email and publication, 24, is denied. Plaintiff must first attempt means of service "by any internationally agreed means. that is reasonably calculated to give notice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(1); see also Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S. 306, 317 (1950). If there is no internationally agreed means, Plaintiff shall attempt service by the means specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(2). If those means fail, Plaintiff may inform the court and petition this court again for permission to serve process via "other means not prohibited by international agreement." Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). |
| 2025-10-21 | STATUS Report by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-09-19 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-09-19 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Plaintiff's Motion for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 2025-09-15 | STATUS Report by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-09-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report due by 9/16/2025, updating the court on how plaintiff seeks to proceed in this litigation. |
| 2025-08-22 | Second Amended Complaint AMENDED complaint by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-08-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's memorandum regarding joinder. 19. Having considered the memorandum and plaintiff's other filings in this case, the court finds that joinder of the defendants identified in plaintiff's amended Schedule A, [17-2], is improper. Rule 20 allows a plaintiff to join multiple defendants in an action where (1) "any right to relief is asserted against [the defendants] jointly, severally, or in the alternative with respect to or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences" and (2) "any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action." Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Here, plaintiff's arguments in support of joinder are unpersuasive for the reasons stated in Hong Kong Leyuzhen Tech. Co. Ltd. v. Schedule A, No. 25-cv-4947, Dkt. 21 (N.D. Ill. June 3, 2025) and CAO Grp., Inc. v. Schedule A, No. 25-cv-4054, Dkt. 21 (N.D. Ill. May 16, 2025). To cure th |
| 2025-08-06 | MEMORANDUM by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Joinder |
| 2025-08-06 | DECLARATION of Jay Paragoso |
| 2025-08-06 | AMENDED complaint by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-07-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 8/6/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the sepa |
| 2025-07-29 | Unsealed Schedule A by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-07-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal, 8, is denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. Id. at 1-2. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, at Dkt. 15 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 22, 2023). Indeed, "[a]s a general matter [ |
| 2025-07-18 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2025-07-18 | COMPLAINT filed by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23767374. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
