1:25-cv-09002
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-01-28 | ENTERED JUDGMENT Mailed notice |
| 2026-01-28 | SATISFACTION of Judgment |
| 2026-01-27 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2026-01-26 | FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 1/26/2026: Mailed notice |
| 2026-01-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: The remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 31 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's trademarks irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendant (plaintiff has failed to seek an accounting of profits), the value of plaintiff's brand, the potential safety concern for the public due to the counterfeit battery, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes, within its discretion, that $100,000 is an |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-11-26 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-11-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 31 for entry of default and default judgment against all defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 12/9/25. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Mailed notice |
| 2025-11-21 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 11/21/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-11-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 24 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendant will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established that it provided electronic notice to defendant of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on b |
| 2025-11-19 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 31 |
| 2025-11-19 | MEMORANDUM by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation in support of motion for default judgment 31 |
| 2025-11-19 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendants Identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-10-30 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-10-29 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion for entry of a preliminary injunction 24. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all remaining defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by or before November 12, 2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's order entering the TRO, the TRO is extended to and including the date upon which the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum du |
| 2025-10-28 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-10-28 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 10/27/2025, answer due 11/17/2025. |
| 2025-10-27 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 24 |
| 2025-10-27 | MEMORANDUM by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation in support of motion for preliminary injunction 24 |
| 2025-10-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction |
| 2025-10-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2025-10-21 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 1,0000 posted by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation (Document not scanned) |
| 2025-10-17 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-10-15 | [封存] SEALED ORDER Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings on 10/15/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-10-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages 14 and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and for electronic service of process 15 are granted. The evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and sales into Illinois), that the harm to plaintiff is irreparable, and that an injunction is in the public interest. An injunction serves the public interest because of the consumer confusion caused by counterfeit goods, and there is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendants and to implement the asse |
| 2025-09-10 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Exhibit 2 to Paragoso Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 16 |
| 2025-09-10 | MEMORANDUM by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 15 |
| 2025-09-10 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 2025-09-10 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation |
| 2025-09-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: The Court has reviewed plaintiff's motion to transfer 11, in which plaintiff maintains that this case should be transferred to Judge Valderrama based on the prior dismissal of defendant Lp Direct in a case before him involving the same plaintiff, Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation v. Schedule A, Case No. 25-cv-6491. Although plaintiff represents that Judge Valderrama "routinely requires plaintiff[s] in Schedule A cases to sever down to one (1) defendant," there is no indication that Judge Valderrama issued such an order here or otherwise dismissed defendant Lp Direct without prejudice in that matter. Instead, plaintiff amended the complaint on its own accord. As such, there does not appear to be a basis to transfer this case under Local Rule 40.3(b)(2), which allows for direct assignment "[w]hen a case is dismissed with prejudice or without." Moreover, although plaintiff represents in its 9/4/25 status report that Case No. 25-cv-64 |
| 2025-09-04 | STATUS Report by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-07-31 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Sealed Schedule A |
| 2025-07-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2025-07-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation by Elizabeth Aubree Miller |
| 2025-07-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation by John Wilson |
| 2025-07-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 2025-07-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 2025-07-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation by Michael A. Hierl |
| 2025-07-31 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-07-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation to transfer case |
| 2025-07-31 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation |
| 2025-07-31 | COMPLAINT filed by Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23820322. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
