1:25-cv-11255
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-12-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Minute entry [32] is amended as follows: Defendant has not responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion [28] is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of Plaintiff's marks irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. Because this infringement was willful and considering the value of Plaintiff's brand as well as the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $5,000.00 is an appropriate award of statutory damages against Defendant. However, treble damages and attorney's fees are not warranted because Plaintiff has not met its burden of establishing the requisite level of willfulness to warrant that additional relief. See Kenall Mfg. Co. v. Cooper Lighting, LLC, |
| 2025-12-17 | [封存] MAILED Copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 12/16/2025 to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-12-16 | DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 12/16/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-12-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Defendant has not responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 28 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of Plaintiff's marks irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. Because this infringement was willful and considering the value of Plaintiff's brand as well as the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $5,000.00 is an appropriate award of statutory damages against Defendant. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-12-04 | CERTIFICATE of Service in Compliance with Docket 30 by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn on behalf of Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding order on motion for default judgment, set deadlines, [30] |
| 2025-12-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for default and default judgment [28] is granted in part as to the request for entry of default. Plaintiff has shown that Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES was served on 11/7/25 and failed to plead or otherwise defend this action by 11/28/25 [27]. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), default is entered against Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES. Plaintiff's motion is entered and continued as to the request for entry of a default judgment. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment are due by 12/9/25. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve a copy of this order on defaulted Defendant within one business day of entry and promptly file proof of such service. The motion hearing set for 12/17/25 [29] is stricken. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-12-01 | Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for default judgment, [28] before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 12/17/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-12-01 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for default judgment as to Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES |
| 2025-11-07 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to MIRAJ ENTERPRISES on 11/7/2025, answer due 11/28/2025. |
| 2025-10-30 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant MIRAJ ENTERPRISES |
| 2025-10-30 | [封存] SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) MIRAJ ENTERPRISES by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2025-10-30 | ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/30/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-10-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service [21] is granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with online marketplace defendants. Enter Order Authorizing Electronic Service of Process. Motion hearing set for 11/4/25 [22] is stricken. A status report regarding next steps is due by 12/4/25, if other appropriate relief has not been sought by that date. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-10-29 | Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for service by publication, [21] before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 11/4/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-10-29 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for service by publication and Electronic Service |
| 2025-10-09 | ORDER AUTHORIZING EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/9/2025. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-10-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's renewed motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery 17 is granted. The Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to obtain Defendant's contact information. Enter Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery. The motion hearing set for 10/14/25 18 is stricken. If no other relief has been sought, Plaintiff is ordered to file a status report by 10/30/25 updating the Court on the progress of expedited discovery and proposed next steps in the case. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-10-08 | Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for order, 17 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/14/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-10-08 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for order for Expedited Discovery RENEWED |
| 2025-10-08 | FIRST AMENDED complaint by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited against MIRAJ ENTERPRISES and terminating The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A for Copyright Infringement |
| 2025-10-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. On 9/17/25, Plaintiff filed a redacted complaint with three exhibits under seal 1, which included the copyright information and a Schedule A listing 7 defendants. Plaintiff also filed a motion for leave to file under seal 4, a sealed exhibit to the declaration of K. Kuhn 5, and a motion for leave to conduct excited discovery 13. Upon review of the copyright infringement complaint and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all 7 defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20. See Viking Arm AS v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A,No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Indeed, Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations about coordinated counterfeiting activity between 7 defendants without any details whatsoever, which arguably violates the requireme |
| 2025-09-22 | Plaintiff's NOTICE of Motion by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn for presentment of motion for order, 13, motion to seal, 4 before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 10/2/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-09-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for order for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-09-18 | [封存] MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn |
| 2025-09-17 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2025-09-17 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of K. Kuhn regarding MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal 4. |
| 2025-09-17 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal |
| 2025-09-17 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-09-17 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Complaint for Copyright Infringement regarding complaint, 1. |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Gokalp Bayramoglu |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nihat Deniz Bayramoglu |
| 2025-09-17 | COMPLAINT for Copyright Infringement filed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24074729. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
