1:26-cv-01197
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 | DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 5/22/2026. Mailed notice |
| 2026-05-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 52 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's marks irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendant (plaintiff has failed to seek an accounting of profits), the value of plaintiff's brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $50,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages. Plaintiff has also certified and established 56 that it provided elec |
| 2026-05-12 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Robert Payton Mcmurray on behalf of Robert Bosch LLC |
| 2026-05-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 52 for entry of default and default judgment against all remaining defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 5/19/2026. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 5/19/2026. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. A tentative default judgment hearing is set for 5/26/20 |
| 2026-05-11 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 52 |
| 2026-05-11 | MEMORANDUM by Robert Bosch LLC in support of motion for default judgment 52 |
| 2026-05-11 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against Defendants Identified on Amended Schedule A |
| 2026-05-11 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Robert Bosch LLC |
| 2026-04-20 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 4/20/2026. Mailed notice |
| 2026-04-20 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 44 is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendant will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court finds that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established 48 that it provided electronic notice to defendant of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on behalf |
| 2026-04-15 | CERTIFICATE of Service by John Wilson on behalf of Robert Bosch LLC |
| 2026-04-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 44 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all remaining defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 4/19/2026." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 4/19/2026. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Status hearing set for 4/21/2026 at 9:15 a.m. is converted to a tentative preliminary injunction hearing. Mailed notice |
| 2026-04-14 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for preliminary injunction 44 |
| 2026-04-14 | MEMORANDUM by Robert Bosch LLC in support of motion for preliminary injunction 44 |
| 2026-04-14 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC for preliminary injunction Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction |
| 2026-04-13 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Robert Bosch LLC |
| 2026-04-13 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Robert Bosch LLC as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto on 4/13/2026, answer due 5/4/2026. |
| 2026-04-07 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 1,000.00 posted by Robert Bosch LLC |
| 2026-04-01 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 2026-03-31 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 38 is granted. The Court finds good cause to extend the temporary restraining order an additional 14 days to 4/21/2026. Plaintiff shall file a preliminary injunction motion if appropriate no later than 4/14/2026. Telephone status hearing set for 4/7/2026 is stricken and reset to 4/21/2026 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice |
| 2026-03-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC for extension of time Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2026-03-24 | [封存] SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 3/24/2026. Mailed notice |
| 2026-03-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 34 is granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that if the defendant were to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendants could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motion cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. Further, the evi |
| 2026-03-20 | Reconsideration |
| 2026-03-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and electronic service of process 20 is denied without prejudice. To obtain a TRO, a plaintiff "must establish that it has some likelihood of success on the merits; that it has no adequate remedy at law; that without relief it will suffer irreparable harm." GEFT Outdoors, LLC v. City of Westfield, 922 F.3d 357, 364 (7th Cir. 2019). If a plaintiff fails to establish one of these threshold requirements, the court must deny the motion. Id. The evidence submitted by plaintiff fails to establish a likelihood of success on the merits of active infringement as plaintiff failed to file the evidence of the defendant's infringement referenced as Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Jay Harvey Paragoso. Without evidence of the defendant's website containing the alleged infringement, there is no evidence of a likeli |
| 2026-03-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motions for reassignment 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31 are denied. Plaintiff argues that reassignment of these cases is proper under Local Rule 40.4 as related cases. However, joining these cases is not likely to result in a substantial saving of judicial time and effort. The Court has already found that the defendants were improperly joined and that no logical relationship exists between the defendants. So, the finding of infringement against each defendant is an independent and individualized determination based on the separate and unrelated evidence of infringement. Whether one defendant infringed on Plaintiff's trademark has no bearing on another defendant's infringement. Therefore, the Court finds that the conditions for reassignment under Local Rule 40.4(b) are not met. While the Court's prior order instructed plaintiff to indicate that a new action against defendants Nos. 2-9 should be filed as related to t |
| 2026-03-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2459 |
| 2026-03-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2457 |
| 2026-03-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2456 |
| 2026-03-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2418 |
| 2026-03-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2417 |
| 2026-03-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2413 |
| 2026-03-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case |
| 2026-03-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2349 |
| 2026-03-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to reassign case Plaintiff's Motion to Reassign Case No. 26-cv-2348 |
| 2026-03-03 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC Exhibit 2 to Paragoso Declaration regarding memorandum in support of motion, 21 |
| 2026-03-03 | MEMORANDUM by Robert Bosch LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 20 |
| 2026-03-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 2026-03-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation |
| 2026-03-02 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC Amended Schedule A |
| 2026-03-02 | AMENDED complaint by Robert Bosch LLC against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Amended Schedule A Hereto |
| 2026-02-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's memorandum on joinder 15 and determines, within its discretion, that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 10 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 27, 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the Court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Overall, the arguments fall short of establishing a logical relationship among the defendants. The Court is not persuaded that any one defendant's infringement is linked to the next defendant's infringement sufficient to show they are part of the same transaction, occurrence, o |
| 2026-02-12 | MEMORANDUM by Robert Bosch LLC Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Joinder |
| 2026-02-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 8 is entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of 10 defendants in this case. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 2/13/2026, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a single defendant or a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Mailed notice |
| 2026-02-04 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 2026-02-04 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA (lj,) |
| 2026-02-03 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC Sealed Schedule A |
| 2026-02-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2026-02-03 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller |
| 2026-02-03 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by John Wilson |
| 2026-02-03 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 2026-02-03 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 2026-02-03 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Robert Bosch LLC by Michael A. Hierl |
| 2026-02-03 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-02-03 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Robert Bosch LLC |
| 2026-02-03 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Robert Bosch LLC |
| 2026-02-03 | COMPLAINT filed by Robert Bosch LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24675234. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
