1:26-cv-01953
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-15 | Declaration of J. Droter in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Defa |
| 2026-05-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated therein, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file the joint initial status report [34]. The parties' joint initial status report is now due by 7/14/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-05-08 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for extension of time to file Status Report |
| 2026-04-23 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to Swim Chic Elite on 4/23/2026, answer due 5/14/2026. |
| 2026-04-22 | ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF PROCESS: For the reasons stated herein, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process [31]. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 4/22/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-21 | Declaration of Joseph W. Droter in support of Motion for Electronic Service |
| 2026-04-20 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Attorney Katherine M. Kuhn's motion to withdraw as attorney for Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited is granted [29]. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-17 | MOTION by Attorney Katherine M. Kuhn to withdraw as attorney for Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited. No party information provided |
| 2026-04-16 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Swim Chic Elite |
| 2026-04-16 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) Swim Chic Elite by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-04-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: The magistrate judge having ruled (doc. #s [24], [25]) on plaintiff's protective order motion (doc. #[19]), all matters arising under the referral (doc. #[21]) are resolved, and the referral is terminated. Mailed notice. (jn,) |
| 2026-04-10 | STIPULATED Confidentiality and Protective Order. Signed by the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes on 4/10/2026. Mailed notice. (jn,) |
| 2026-04-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: Plaintiff's agreed motion for protective order (doc. #[23]) is granted, with the following addition to Paragraph 7: "nothing in this order permits any document to be filed under seal. Motions to seal documents for good cause must comply with Local Rule 26.2." Enter Agreed Confidentiality Order as modified. In addition to the language in Paragraph 7 of the Agreed Confidentiality Order entered today, the parties are advised that motions to seal will not be granted as to discovery documents filed with the Court unless the request complies with the common law of this Circuit. See Bond v. Utreras, 585 F.3d 1061, 1073 (7th Cir. 2009) (noting that public "has a presumptive right to access discovery materials that are filed with the court"); Baxter Int'l, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 297 F.3d 544, 545-46 (7th Cir. 2002) (stating that filed discovery documents "that influence or underpin the judicial decision are open t |
| 2026-04-09 | Text of Proposed Order |
| 2026-04-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes: This matter coming before the magistrate judge on referral (doc. #[21]) for resolution of plaintiff's "joint" motion (apparently with third party Tik-Tok) (doc. #[19]) for a protective order governing Tik-Tok's subpoena production to plaintiff, the motion is denied without prejudice for failure to attach its Exhibit 1 proposed order and to submit a Word version of that order to the Court's proposed order box. The Court will consider any renewed motion as within the scope of the referral. Mailed notice. (jn,) |
| 2026-04-08 | Pursuant to Local Rule 72.1, this case is hereby referred to the calendar of Honorable Gabriel A. Fuentes for the purpose of holding proceedings related to: Motion for protective order [19]. (jcm). Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for a protective order [19]. The Court refers the resolution of this motion to Magistrate Judge Fuentes. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-03-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited for protective order Joint Motion for Confidentiality and Protective Order with Third-Party TikTok |
| 2026-03-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court denies Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery [17]. Under the Court's discretion, it finds the information sought is more appropriately addressed in the regular course of discovery. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-03-16 | Declaration of Katherine M. Kuhn in support of Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2026-03-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a TRO [15] is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has not come close to meeting the exacting standards of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) to warrant ex parte relief. That is, the Court finds that "the generic copy-and-paste declarations made mostly 'upon information and belief' fall well short of providing 'specific facts' to 'clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result,' and also fail to satisfy the certification requirement." Ren et al v. AilunUS, 25-cv-09278 Dkt. 32 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 22, 2025). That is ample reason to deny this extraordinary request. See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., No. 25 C 2937, 2025 WL 2299593 at *4-7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.) ("Given that any irreparable harm wrought by infringement can, as with more traditional forms of IP litigation, be addressed t |
| 2026-03-09 | Declaration of L. Li in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restrai |
| 2026-02-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [4]. The Court, like many other courts in this District, is unconvinced that "these commonplace efforts in Schedule A cases to obtain secret relief comport with principles of procedural due process." See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2025 WL 2299593 at *7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.); see also Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co. LTD. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, 25-cv-09559 Dkt. No. 10 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 19, 2025) (Hunt, J.). As an initial matter, these infringement cases rarely present exceptional circumstances that would justify sealing the names of all defendants and documents pertaining to their alleged infringing activity, let alone an entire case, even temporarily. "Secrecy makes little sense if the goal of the litigation |
| 2026-02-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 5/14/2026, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule |
| 2026-02-26 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Exhibit 1 to the First Amended Complaint regarding amended complaint, [11] |
| 2026-02-26 | Exhibit 2 to the First Amended Complaint |
| 2026-02-25 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. (qrtr,) |
| 2026-02-20 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu |
| 2026-02-20 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter |
| 2026-02-20 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn |
| 2026-02-20 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-02-20 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Katherine M. Kuhn regarding MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal [4] |
| 2026-02-20 | Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Katherine M. Kuhn |
| 2026-02-20 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-02-20 | (Exhibit 4 to the Complaint) |
| 2026-02-20 | Exhibit 4 to the Complaint |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
