1:26-cv-02764
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-06-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, [32]. This dismissal took effect without court intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Waetzig v. Haliburton Energy Servs., 145 S. Ct. 690, 694 (2025). Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-06-01 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to Defendant aimaduo |
| 2026-05-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's status report [29]. Plaintiff's motion for entry of Clerk's default against defendant, [23], is stricken without prejudice. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 6/5/2026 updating the court on the status of the case. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-05-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file answer, [28], is granted. Defendant to answer or otherwise plead by 6/11/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-05-13 | STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 20 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-05-12 | MOTION by Defendant aimaduo for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint, [1] (unopposed) |
| 2026-05-12 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by aimaduo |
| 2026-05-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant aimaduo by Ni Xue |
| 2026-05-06 | CERTIFICATE of Service in compliance with Docket No. 24 by Joseph Wendell Droter on behalf of Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited regarding text entry, [24] |
| 2026-05-06 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff has moved for entry of default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) against defendant [23]. Defendant is ordered to show cause by 5/13/2026 as to why default should not be entered or they will face entry of default. Plaintiff is directed to promptly serve this order on defendant and file a certificate of service. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-05-05 | Declaration of Joseph W. Droter in support of Motion for Entry of Clerk's D |
| 2026-05-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The motion of attorney Katherine M. Kuhn to withdraw as counsel for plaintiff, [21], is granted. Attorney Katherine M. Kuhn terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-30 | MOTION by Attorney Katherine M. Kuhn to withdraw as attorney for Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited. No party information provided |
| 2026-04-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's status report [19]. The parties are directed to file an updated status report by 5/15/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-15 | STATUS Report in compliance with Docket No. 10 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-04-13 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited as to aimaduo on 4/13/2026, answer due 5/4/2026. |
| 2026-04-10 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant aimaduo |
| 2026-04-10 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) AIMADUO by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-04-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion [14] for electronic service of process is granted. While a preferable means of service, the court is cognizant of the fact that physical service is not always possible. In this case, Plaintiff certifies that it has attempted, but has been unable, to obtain a physical address for defendant. In such a circumstance, a less preferable form of service is permissible. Service via email is "reasonably calculated" to be received by defendant, and it is thus adequate in this case. Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Tr. Co., 339 U.S 306, 319 (1950). What's more, service via email is not barred under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Thus, plaintiff may serve process via email. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-07 | Declaration of Joseph W. Droter in support of Motion for Electronic Service |
| 2026-03-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to conduct expedited discovery [12] is granted subject to the following limitations. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for Defendant "AIMADUO" identified Plaintiff's Amended Schedule A [11-2], or in connection with the Defendant's internet store, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as Temu, LLC ("Temu"), shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine: the identities and locations of Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-03-20 | Memorandum in support of Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2026-03-20 | Exhibit 3 to the First Amended Complaint |
| 2026-03-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion [4] to proceed under seal is denied. Proceeding under seal is extraordinary. Plaintiff has not identified circumstances warranting such extraordinary relief. See generally Eicher Motors Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 25-CV-02937, 2025 WL 2299593 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025). Dkts. 2 and 5 are stricken. Plaintiff is directed to publicly refile its exhibits to its complaint [1] by 3/20/2026. The parties are directed to file an initial joint status report by 4/17/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-03-11 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Nazly Aileen Bayramoglu |
| 2026-03-11 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Katherine Marilyn Kuhn |
| 2026-03-11 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited by Joseph Wendell Droter |
| 2026-03-11 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited |
| 2026-03-11 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Joseph W. Droter regarding MOTION by Plaintiff Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited to seal [4] |
| 2026-03-11 | Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Joseph W. Droter |
| 2026-03-11 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-03-11 | (Exhibit 4 to the Complaint) |
| 2026-03-11 | Exhibit 4 to the Complaint |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
