1:26-cv-03319
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process and expedited discovery [8] is stricken as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-06 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: On review of Plaintiff's amended complaint [7], the Court observes that Plaintiff has not provided evidence that any Defendant has sold the allegedly infringing products to Illinois customers and shipped the products into Illinois. As the Seventh Circuit has recently affirmed, the Court cannot conclude that it has personal jurisdiction over a Schedule A defendant absent such information. Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, 2026 WL 880018, at *3 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). Screenshots showing a finalized order do not suffice under Liu. Additionally, Plaintiff has failed to file a memorandum supporting joinder, despite the Court's previous order [4]. The Court therefore dismisses Plaintiff's amended complaint without prejudice. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint within 21 days if it can supply evidence sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction. Additionally, if Plaintiff's second amended complaint names multiple defendants, |
| 2026-04-03 | Miscellaneous Relief |
| 2026-04-03 | Amended Complaint |
| 2026-03-27 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. |
| 2026-03-27 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 2026-03-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman: This case has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman. Plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 34 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19 and 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder at least 7 days before the filing of the motion for temporary restraining order. Alternatively, by the same date, Plaintiff may file an amended complaint and amended Schedule A reducing the number of defendants. However, if Pla |
| 2026-03-26 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by NextClimb Investments LLC |
| 2026-03-26 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by NextClimb Investments LLC |
| 2026-03-26 | COMPLAINT filed by NextClimb Investments LLC; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24898802. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
