1:26-cv-04594
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion [5] to proceed under seal is denied. The court notes that plaintiff has also, without permission, filed pseudonymously--the court construes that as a request to proceed pseudonymously and denies that request for the reasons that follow. Plaintiff argues it ought to be able to proceed under seal and via a pseudonym by asserting, in conclusory fashion, that if defendants learned of the proceedings they might destroy relevant documents and hide or transfer their assets. [5] at 2. Such conclusory assertions, however, do not justify veiled proceedings. Generally speaking, good cause is required to seal court filings which are otherwise part of the public record. Cf. Citizens First Nat. Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 178 F.3d 943, 945 (7th Cir. 1999). Otherwise, the "general rule is that the record of a judicial proceeding is public." Jessup v. Luther, 277 F.3d 926, 927 (2002). That |
| 2026-04-23 | MOTION by Plaintiff John Doe for leave to file under seal |
| 2026-04-23 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff John Doe by Longhao Wang |
| 2026-04-23 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-04-23 | (Exhibit B) |
| 2026-04-23 | (Exhibit B (redacted)) |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
