1:23-cv-00432
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2023-04-30 | SATISFACTION of Judgment as to Defendant no. 91 RLINGX Dealer |
| 2023-04-13 | DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 4/13/2023. Mailed notice. |
| 2023-04-13 | ORDER: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment 25. The motion is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded in the amount of $100,000 per defendant, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its marks causes it irreparable harm in the form of diminished goodwill and brand confidence, damage to plaintiff's reputation, loss of exclusivity, and loss of future sales; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendant has appeared to argue otherwise, thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. |
| 2023-04-11 | STATUS Report by Jeff Bartels |
| 2023-04-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 47, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 30 lichengqukeyuanbaihuodian and No. 33 jkfgweeryhrt under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 30 lichengqukeyuanbaihuodian and No. 33 jkfgweeryhrt from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed an amended Schedule A form on the docket 48. |
| 2023-04-07 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Jeff Bartels |
| 2023-04-07 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to Defendant no. 30 lichengqukeyuanbaihuodian and no. 33 jkfgweeryhrt |
| 2023-04-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold:By 4/11/2023, plaintiff and any appearing defendants that remain in the case shall file a status report with an update on the status of all remaining defendants in the case (i.e., which defendants have appeared, any pending motions and to which defendants those motion(s) relate, the status of settlement discussions, and any other pertinent information as to the status of the case or matters the parties wish to raise). Emailed notice. |
| 2023-04-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 43, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 105 yes2ding and No. 84 qisngxacxcshcbbvaa under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 105 yes2ding and No. 84 qisngxacxcshcbbvaa from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 85758, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed an amended Schedule A form on the docket 44. Emailed notice. |
| 2023-04-06 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Jeff Bartels |
| 2023-04-06 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to Defendant no. 105 yes2ding and no. 84 qisngxacxcshcbbvaa |
| 2023-04-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 40, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 103 DailyLifeArt, No. 73 lu ku han, and No. 12 putianshichengxiangquqinmiehuamaoyiyouxiangongsi under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 103 DailyLifeArt, No. 73 lu ku han, and No. 12 putianshichengxiangquqinmiehuamaoyiyouxiangongsi from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 85758, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff is directed to file an amended Schedule A form by 4/6/2023 identifying the remaining defendants. Emailed notice. |
| 2023-04-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant yes2ding's motion for extension of time to answer plaintiff's complaint 39 is granted. Defendant yes2ding's answer is due by 4/21/2023. Emailed notice. |
| 2023-04-03 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants |
| 2023-03-31 | MOTION by Defendant yes2ding for extension of time to file answer |
| 2023-03-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 36, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 1 Tlovudori, No. 2 Aremetop, No. 102 Asminifor Direct, No. 106 Fukeen, No. 74 aguoppeng, No. 76 QWTGIUN PSMIH KBDU, No. 13 FANGCYZI, No. 20 xingyangjia, No. 11 dong haijuan, and No. 104 FJRUIFGV under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 1 Tlovudori, No. 2 Aremetop, No. 102 Asminifor Direct, No. 106 Fukeen, No. 74 aguoppeng, No. 76 QWTGIUN PSMIH KBDU, No. 13 FANGCYZI, No. 20 xingyangjia, No. 11 dong haijuan, and No. 104 FJRUIFGV from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d |
| 2023-03-15 | Amended Schedule A 2 to Compalint 1 by Jeff Bartels |
| 2023-03-15 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants |
| 2023-03-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: As to defendant yes2ding: Defendant yes2ding's motion for extension of time to answer plaintiff's complaint 33 is granted. Defendant yes2ding's answer is due by 3/31/2023. |
| 2023-03-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 30, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 85 ling jing gui guai store, No. 87 hongxing E, No. 16 xinkaishengkeji, No. 19 The C Market, No. 27 KristiPeterson, No. 79 XUTAI, No. 81 Guojew, No. 35 HeyLi, No. 82 lijunpseng, and No. 7 HolandNana under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing defendants No. 85 ling jing gui guai store, No. 87 hongxing E, No. 16 xinkaishengkeji, No. 19 The C Market, No. 27 KristiPeterson, No. 79 XUTAI, No. 81 Guojew, No. 35 HeyLi, No. 82 lijunpseng, and No. 7 HolandNana from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 7 |
| 2023-03-10 | MOTION by Defendant yes2ding for extension of time to file answer |
| 2023-03-10 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant yes2ding by Brian Swift |
| 2023-03-10 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Jeff Bartels |
| 2023-03-10 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants |
| 2023-03-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for default judgment as to The Defendants Identified In The First Amended Schedule A |
| 2023-02-16 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/16/2023: |
| 2023-02-16 | ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/16/2023. Mailed notice. |
| 2023-02-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: No defendant has appeared or filed an objection to the motion for preliminary injunction 21. A preliminary injunction is appropriate for the same reasons a TRO was granted and is unopposed. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 18 is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Schedule A to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov. |
| 2023-02-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction 18 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 2/15/2023. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. |
| 2023-02-07 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeff Bartels as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/7/2023, answer due 2/28/2023. |
| 2023-02-07 | MEMORANDUM by Jeff Bartels in support of motion for preliminary injunction 18 |
| 2023-02-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for preliminary injunction |
| 2023-02-02 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $10,000.00 posted by Jeff Bartels (Document not scanned) |
| 2023-01-27 | [封存] SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/27/2023: |
| 2023-01-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in plaintiff's motions (10, 11, 12), the supporting memorandum 13 and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal 10 and for leave to file excess pages 11 are granted. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by email and/or electronic publication 12 is granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infrin |
| 2023-01-26 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Jeff Bartels regarding memorandum in support of motion 13 |
| 2023-01-26 | MEMORANDUM In Support of 12 Ex Parte Motion |
| 2023-01-26 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for leave to file excess pages |
| 2023-01-26 | MOTION by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels for leave to file [Certain] Documents Under Seal |
| 2023-01-25 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2023-01-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 2023-01-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Adam Grodman |
| 2023-01-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Yi Bu |
| 2023-01-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Yanling Jiang |
| 2023-01-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jeff Bartels by Keith A. Vogt |
| 2023-01-24 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2023-01-24 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Jeff Bartels Schedule A to Complaint (1) |
| 2023-01-24 | COMPLAINT filed by Jeff Bartels ; Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AILNDC-20270738. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
