1:24-cv-00545
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2024-05-24 | RETURN of U.S. Post Office Receipt, article no. 7019 2280 0000 0962 8620 (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 5/24/24.) |
| 2024-05-17 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. |
| 2024-05-17 | DEFAULT Judgment signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 5/17/2024. Mailed notice |
| 2024-05-17 | ORDER: No defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment, 28. The motion is granted. Based on the evidence submitted in support of the temporary restraining order and the motion for entry of default and default judgment, and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that the infringement was willful, that damages should be awarded in the amount of $100,000 per defendant, and that a permanent injunction should be entered. Plaintiff has shown that the infringement of its marks causes it irreparable harm in the form of diminished goodwill and brand confidence, damage to plaintiff's reputation, loss of exclusivity, and loss of future sales; that monetary damages are inadequate to address these harms; and that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. No defendant has appeared to argue otherwise; thus, the court also finds that the balance of the hardships favors an injunction. The $10, |
| 2024-05-16 | STATUS Report by Albert Koetsier |
| 2024-05-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal, 45, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss defendants No. 39 Zhuoshengben., Ltd., No. 42 Shuntuo., Ltd, No. 43 Yanyijiang under Rule 41(a)(1). Again, plaintiff is reminded that Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."); see also 36. The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by dropping defendants No. 39 Zhuoshengben., Ltd., No. 42 Shuntuo., Ltd, No. 43 Yanyijiang from the complaint, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed the amended complaint on the docket. See 46. Defendants No. 39 Zhuoshengben., Ltd., No. 42 Shuntuo., Ltd, No. 43 Yanyijiang |
| 2024-05-14 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Albert Koetsier |
| 2024-05-14 | STIPULATION of Dismissal JOINT AGREED |
| 2024-05-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff and any defendants who have appeared and remain in the litigation should file a joint status report by 5/16/2024 updating the court on the status of the case and proposed next steps. |
| 2024-04-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendant's unopposed motion for an extension of time, 41 is granted. Defendants' answer or otherwise responsive pleading is due by 5/8/24. |
| 2024-04-18 | STATUS Report by Albert Koetsier |
| 2024-04-17 | MOTION by Defendants Shuntuo., Ltd, Yanyijiang for extension of time UNOPPOSED |
| 2024-04-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 4/18/2024, plaintiff should file a status report updating the court on the status of the case, including whether any defendants remain who have appeared and not been dismissed and proposed next steps. |
| 2024-04-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal, 37, which seeks to voluntarily dismiss the defendants named in that motion under Rule 41(a)(1). But plaintiff is reminded again that Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. See Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."); see also 36. The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing the defendants named in, 37, from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed an amended Schedule A on the docket, 38. |
| 2024-04-10 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Albert Koetsier |
| 2024-04-10 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants |
| 2024-03-20 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of dismissal 33, which seek to voluntarily dismiss the defendants named in those motions under Rule 41(a)(1). But Rule 41(a) is not the proper vehicle for dismissing some, but not all, parties to an action. Taylor v. Brown, 787 F.3d 851, 857 (7th Cir. 2015) ("Rule 41(a) should be limited to dismissal of an entire action."). The court therefore construes plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal as a request for leave to amend the pleadings under Rule 15(a)(2) by removing the defendants named in 33 from the Schedule A form, see Taylor, 787 F.3d at 857-58, and the court grants plaintiff leave to amend the pleadings. Plaintiff has already filed an amended Schedule A on the docket, 34. Bisibuy-US, Dsseng Co., Ltd, FeiSu Shop, Fu Miao love home textiles, GsooT, IFJD, Ieskayiz Home, KH home decor, PEACNNG Co. Ltd, QJUHUNG Co. Ltd, Shangju Technology Co., ltd, TYCZ Handmade, Tapesb, YUA Tablecloths, |
| 2024-03-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Defendants' unopposed motion for extension of time 32 is granted. Defendants should file an answer or otherwise responsive pleading by 4/17/24. |
| 2024-03-19 | Amended Schedule A 2 by Albert Koetsier |
| 2024-03-19 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by All Plaintiffs as to [Certain] defendants |
| 2024-03-18 | MOTION by Defendants Shuntuo., Ltd, Yanyijiang, Zhuoshengben., Ltd for extension of time UNOPPOSED |
| 2024-03-18 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Shuntuo., Ltd, Yanyijiang, Zhuoshengben., Ltd by Adam Edward Urbanczyk |
| 2024-03-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Any defendant objecting to plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment, 28, must enter an appearance and file a written objection by 3/18/2024. If no objections are filed, the court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. |
| 2024-03-06 | MEMORANDUM by Albert Koetsier in support of motion for default judgment 28 |
| 2024-03-06 | MOTION by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against the Defendants Identified in First Amended Schedule A.pdf |
| 2024-02-21 | ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/21/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-02-21 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 2/21/2024: |
| 2024-02-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: No defendant has appeared or filed an objection to the motion for preliminary injunction, 20. A preliminary injunction is appropriate for the same reasons a TRO was granted and is unopposed. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 20 is granted. Enter Preliminary Injunction. The Clerk is directed to unseal any previously sealed documents in this matter. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to add all defendants listed on Exhibit 1 to the court's docket within three business days. Instructions on how to do so may be located on the court's website at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/instructions. |
| 2024-02-07 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier regarding set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, 23 |
| 2024-02-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has taken the motion for preliminary injunction 20 under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 2/16/2024. Plaintiff shall serve defendants with this notice. For the reasons stated in the court's order entering the TRO, the TRO is further extended to and including the date on which the court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." Id. at 844. |
| 2024-02-05 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Albert Koetsier as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/5/2024, answer due 2/26/2024. |
| 2024-02-05 | MEMORANDUM by Albert Koetsier in support of motion for preliminary injunction 20 |
| 2024-02-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier for preliminary injunction |
| 2024-01-30 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000 posted by Albert Koetsier. (Document not Imaged) |
| 2024-01-26 | [封存] TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 1/26/2024: Modified on 2/22/2024. |
| 2024-01-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: For the reasons set forth in the motions (12, 13, and 14) filed by Albert Koetsier, the supporting memoranda (15, 16) and the temporary restraining order, plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and service of process by mail and/or electronic publication 14, motion for leave to file excess pages 13, and motion to seal 12, are granted. Plaintiff's filings support proceeding (for the time being) on an ex parte basis. Specifically, were defendants to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, it is likely assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping defendants' infringing conduct, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the evidence submitted by plaintiff shows a substantial likelihood of success on the merits (including evidence of active infringement and |
| 2024-01-24 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Albert Koetsier regarding memorandum in support of motion, 15 Modified on 2/22/2024. |
| 2024-01-24 | MEMORANDUM in support of 14 Exparte motion |
| 2024-01-24 | EX PARTE MOTION by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier to for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and or Electronic Publication |
| 2024-01-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier for leave to file excess pages |
| 2024-01-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier for leave to file under seal |
| 2024-01-23 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2024-01-22 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Albert Koetsier by Monica Rita Martin |
| 2024-01-22 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Albert Koetsier by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 2024-01-22 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Albert Koetsier by Adam Grodman |
| 2024-01-22 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Albert Koetsier by Yi Bu |
| 2024-01-22 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Albert Koetsier by Yanling Jiang |
| 2024-01-22 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Albert Koetsier by Keith A. Vogt |
| 2024-01-22 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2024-01-22 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Albert Koetsier Schedule A to Complaint 1 Modified on 2/22/2024. |
| 2024-01-22 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Albert Koetsier by Christopher Romero |
| 2024-01-22 | COMPLAINT filed by Albert Koetsier; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-21552009. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
