1:24-cv-05218
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-07-16 | MOTION by Attorney Joseph Hooper to withdraw as attorney for Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC. No party information provided |
| 2026-03-11 | RETURN of of U.S. Post Office Receipt, article no. 7021 1970 0001 3330 1097. (Received by mail in the Clerk's Office on 03/11/26.) |
| 2026-03-02 | DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment [298]; [303] is granted. Statutory damages are awarded as indicated in the Order. This statutory award is appropriate to balance the goals of deterrence and providing some measure of compensation without crossing the line into over-deterrence and punishment. This award shall apply to each distinct Defaulting Defendant only once, even if they are listed under multiple different aliases in the Complaint and Schedule A. Enter Final Judgment Order. The ten-thousand dollar ($10,000.00) surety bond posted by Plaintiff, including any interest minus the registry fee, is hereby released to Plaintiff or its counsel, Bishop & Diehl, Ltd. The Clerk of the Court is directed to return the surety bond previously deposited with the Clerk of the Court to Plaintiff or its counsel. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 3/2/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necess |
| 2025-12-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Attorneys Edward L. Bishop and James J. Jagoda's motion to withdraw [304] is granted. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-12-16 | MOTION by Attorney Edward L. Bishop, Benjamin A. Campbell, and James J. Jagoda to withdraw as attorney for Pathway IP LLC. No party information provided |
| 2025-10-29 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLCEntry of Proposed Order for Default and Default Judgment as to Non-Appearing Defendants (Poplin, Allen Justin) |
| 2025-09-29 | MEMORANDUM motion for default judgment, 298, order on motion to stay, terminate deadlines and hearings, terminate referral, set/clear flags, 301 by Pathway IP LLC (Poplin, Allen Justin) |
| 2025-09-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The parties' Joint/Consented Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Reexamination [300] is granted. This case is stayed pending resolution of the '924 Reexamination. The referral in this matter is terminated for docket control purposes. In the future, if or when this case is active in the District Court, if a referral needs to be regenerated, that easily can be accomplished. Referral terminated. Mailed notice |
| 2025-09-23 | Exhibit Exhibit A |
| 2025-09-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's amended motion for default judgment [298]. Plaintiff's renewed motion for default judgment [245] is denied as moot. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-09-11 | (Exhibit Damages Table) |
| 2025-09-06 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's motion to sever defaulting Defendants [296] is denied. Rather than severing the defaulting Defendants, the Court finds it most appropriate for Plaintiff to file an amended motion for default and default judgment against those Defendants who have still not appeared in this case. Plaintiff's amended motion shall be filed by 09/18/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-08-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC to sever Presented before District Judge |
| 2025-07-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Plaintiff Pathway IP, LLC's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines [293] is granted for good cause shown. The Court grants the Motion and extends the claim construction briefing as follows: Responsive Claim Construction Brief by the patent infringement asserter pursuant to LPR 4.2(c) shall be filed by 9/23/2025; Reply Claim Construction Brief pursuant to LPR 4.2(d) shall be filed by 10/7/2025; and Joint Claim Construction Chart shall be filed by 10/14/2025. By 10/18/2025, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report on the status of written and oral discovery, including any proposed or scheduled dates for any remaining fact witness depositions. A claim construction hearing will be set by the assigned District Judge in accordance with LPR 4.3. |
| 2025-07-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Counter Defendants Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC by Joseph Paul Hooper |
| 2025-07-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for extension of time UNOPPOSED Presented before Magistrate Judge (Poplin, Allen Justin) |
| 2025-07-24 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Counter Defendants Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC by Allen Justin Poplin (Poplin, Allen Justin) |
| 2025-07-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: By 8/19/2025, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report on the status of written and oral discovery, including any proposed or scheduled dates for any remaining fact witness depositions. Mailed notice |
| 2025-07-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Plaintiff Pathway IP, LLC's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadlines in View of Change in Representation [289] is granted for good cause shown. The Court grants the Motion and extends the claim construction briefing as follows: Responsive Claim Construction Brief (by the patent infringement asserter) pursuant to LPR 4.2(c)) shall be filed by 7/25/2025; Reply Claim Construction Brief pursuant to LPR 4.2(d) shall be filed by 8/8/2025; and Joint Claim Construction Chart shall be filed by 8/15/2025. In addition, pursuant to the parties' Joint Stipulation and Motion to Continue Discovery During Claim Construction Proceedings [284], the case schedule entered on 9/17/2024 [191] is modified to permit discovery to proceed during claim construction briefing and until 42 days after the Court's claim construction ruling. Mailed notice |
| 2025-07-01 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for extension of time (unopposed) Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2025-07-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension [287] is denied without prejudice. The Court notes that Magistrate Judge Gilbert issued the Rule 16 Scheduling Order in this matter [191]. Accordingly, any requests for modifications of that scheduling order shall be presented to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-06-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for extension of time (unopposed) Presented before District Judge |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Counter Defendants Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC by Allen Justin Poplin (Poplin, Allen Justin) |
| 2025-06-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Counter Defendants Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Pathway IP LLC, Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC by Hissan Anis |
| 2025-06-10 | STIPULATION regarding text entry, [283] to continue discovery during claim construction |
| 2025-06-05 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report [278]. In that report, the parties stated they anticipated filing, by early in the week of 5/23/25, a joint stipulation and motion to continue discovery during the period of claim construction briefing. Nothing was filed. The parties shall file any such stipulation or motion by 6/10/25 or, alternatively, the parties shall file by that date a Joint Status Report addressing the status of discovery and other matters that have a bearing on case management. Emailed notice |
| 2025-06-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated therein, attorney Jeffrey E. Schiller's motion to withdraw [280] is granted. Attorney Jeffrey Edward Schiller terminated as attorney for Okshopping, Okshopping, Woputne-US, and Woputne-US. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-05-30 | Appendix LPR 4.2 Joint Appendix OCR 2 |
| 2025-05-29 | Notification of Party Contact Information |
| 2025-05-29 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Okshopping, Woputne-US by Mingzi Ouyang |
| 2025-05-23 | STATUS Report by Pathway IP LLC Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2025-05-06 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court has reviewed the parties' Updated Joint Status Report 276. The parties shall file an updated joint status report by 5/23/25 addressing whether initial fact discovery pursuant to LPR 1.3 is complete and if there are any remaining disputes regarding that discovery. Mailed notice |
| 2025-05-01 | STATUS Report by Pathway IP LLC Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2025-04-10 | STIPULATION regarding terminate deadlines, set deadlines, 274 (Joint) |
| 2025-04-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status report 273. Plaintiff and the GTV Defendants shall file by 4/10/25 a stipulation memorializing their agreement about their exchange of Final Infringement and Invalidity Contentions, and any other schedule change requested as to those parties. The parties shall file an updated joint status report by 5/1/25. Mailed notice |
| 2025-04-03 | STATUS Report (Joint) by Pathway IP LLC Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2025-03-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated therein, Attorney Nicholas S. Lee's motion to withdraw as attorney for Plaintiff 271 is granted. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-03-20 | MOTION by Attorney Nicholas S. Lee to withdraw as attorney for Pathway IP LLC. No party information provided Presented before District Judge |
| 2025-03-13 | ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Order, the Court grants Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, and Aixiangpai's motion to dismiss 111, Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit's motion to dismiss 124, and Defendant's Kaiess and Weilisi's motion to dismiss 140. The Court dismisses without prejudice Pathway's claims against Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, and Aixiangpai, AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit, Kaiess and Weilisi. The Court denies as moot Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, and Aixiangpai's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction 116. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 3/13/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-03-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report 260. The parties shall file an updated Joint Status Report by 4/3/25 that addresses the following: (1) the parties' progress with written discovery including whether production of party documents is complete and whether any party issued follow-up discovery as mentioned in the status report; (2) the status of any Local Rule 37.2 discussions, whether the parties intend to engage in motion practice regarding any disputes and, if so, a date by which the parties will complete the Local Rule 37.2 process and by which any necessary motions will be filed; (3) the parties' progress with the Rule 16 Scheduling Order 191 entered on 9/17/24, including whether the parties have complied with the deadlines set in that Order; (4) whether the case management schedule needs to be modified in any way and, if so, whether good cause exists to do so within the meaning of Fed |
| 2025-02-27 | STIPULATION of Dismissal as to Def. No. 6 |
| 2025-02-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC by James Joseph Jagoda |
| 2025-02-21 | NOTICE by AIXIANGPAI 101089568, Aixiangpai re order on motion to withdraw as attorney, add and terminate attorneys, 265 of Compliance to Serve Order [DE 265] |
| 2025-02-20 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, Attorney Jianyin Liu's motion to withdraw 264 is granted. Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568 and Aixiangpai are granted until 03/24/2025 to retain new counsel. The Court notes that corporations are not permitted to represent themselves in federal court. See 1756 W. Lake St. LLC v. Am. Chartered Bank, 787 F.3d 383, 385 (7th Cir. 2015) (noting the "requirement that a limited liability company be represented in litigation by a lawyer"); Philos Techs., Inc. v. Philos & D, Inc., 645 F.3d 851, 858 (7th Cir. 2011) ("[C]orporations must appear by counsel or not at all.") Failure to obtain substitute counsel by the date set forth above may subject Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568 and Aixiangpai to the entry of an order of default and ultimately to the entry of a default judgment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568 and Aixiangpai's con |
| 2025-02-19 | MOTION by Attorney Jianyin Liu to withdraw as attorney for AIXIANGPAI 101089568, Aixiangpai. New address information: Feifei Fei, GEW2017@163.com Presented before District Judge |
| 2025-02-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court denies Attorney Jianyin Liu's motion for leave to withdraw as attorney 262 without prejudice. Attorney Liu has not complied with Local Rule 83.17 as he failed to attach the "Notification of Party Contact Information" to the motion. Attorney Liu is instructed to attach the Notification of Party Contact Information to a renewed motion for leave to withdraw. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-02-17 | MOTION by Attorney Jianyin Liu to withdraw as attorney for AIXIANGPAI 101089568, Aixiangpai. New address information: Feifei Fei, Email: GEW2017@163.com Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2025-02-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's motion for clarification is granted 259. The preliminary injunction remains in effect as to all non-appearing Defendants. See R. 259 at 3 (list of non-appearing Defendants). Mailed notice. |
| 2025-02-07 | STATUS Report joint re: discovery by Pathway IP LLC Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2025-02-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC to clarify status of preliminary injunction as to non-appearing Defendants Presented before District Judge |
| 2025-01-31 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Given the Court's denial of Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction, Defendant ATKTTOP's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction 104 is terminated as moot. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-01-30 | ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 1/30/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-01-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed de novo Plaintiff's objections to Magistrate Judge Gilberts Report and Recommendation 239 and the Report itself 235. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Order, the Court overrules Plaintiff's objections, adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety, and denies Pathway's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 69. Enter Order. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-01-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The parties shall file a joint status report on their progress with written and oral discovery by 2/7/25. Mailed notice |
| 2025-01-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed Defendant ATKTTOP's (ATKTTOP) motion to expedite ruling on motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction 252. The motion, whether intentional or otherwise, mischaracterizes the state of the case. A preliminary injunction (PI) was entered against ATKTTOP on 8/15/2024 99 because at the time the Court granted Plaintiff's motion for PI, ATKTTOP had yet to appear. While other appearing Defendants were allowed to file responses to Plaintiff's motion for PI, ATKTTOP's non-appearance at the time the PI was entered required it to file a motion to dissolve as opposed to a response. Therefore, although styled as a motion, ATKTTOP's motion to dissolve is more properly characterized as a response to Plaintiff's motion for PI, as it raises arguments mirrored in the responses of appearing Defendants. Plaintiff's motion for PI was referred to Magistrate Judge Gilbert on 09/11/2024 for a Report |
| 2025-01-17 | REPLY by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC to Response 251 |
| 2025-01-16 | (Exhibit) |
| 2025-01-08 | RESPONSE by Defendants Woputne-US, Okshopping to objection to report and recommendations 239 |
| 2025-01-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Over Plaintiff's objection, the Court grants Defendants Woputne-US and Okshopping's (Defendants) motion for leave to file a response 249. Defendants shall file their response as a separate entry on the docket by 01/08/2025. Plaintiff may file a separate reply to Defendants' response, limited to three (3) pages, by 01/17/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-01-06 | (Exhibit A. DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION) |
| 2025-01-03 | REPLY by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC to Response 243, Response 242, Response 241 |
| 2025-01-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court denies Defendant Woputne-US, Okshopping's (Defendant) motion for leave to file a response to Plaintiff's objections 244 without prejudice, as Defendant has failed to clearly indicate in the motion whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, "[b]efore filing a motion, the movant's counsel must ask opposing counsel whether there is an objection to the motion. The motion should clearly indicate whether it is opposed or unopposed." By 01/06/2025, Defendant may file another motion for leave, and in that motion, Defendant must clearly indicate whether the motion is opposed or unopposed. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-12-30 | (Exhibit B) |
| 2024-12-27 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necess |
| 2024-12-27 | MOTION by Defendants Woputne-US, Okshopping for leave to file THEIR RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-12-20 | RESPONSE by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, Lanyuantai, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Qirui-US, CY Direct US, Legee Tech, iphoto digit, Pixel Lighting to objection to report and recommendations 239 |
| 2024-12-20 | RESPONSE by Defendant AIXIANGPAI 101089568 to objection to report and recommendations 239 |
| 2024-12-20 | RESPONSE by Defendants Weilisi, Kaiess to objection to report and recommendations 239 in support of the 11/18/2024 Report and Recommendation 235 |
| 2024-12-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Plaintiff's Objections to Magistrate Judge Gilbert's 11/18/2024 Report and Recommendation 235 : Defendants' response is due 12/20/2024. Plaintiff's reply is due 1/3/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-12-02 | OBJECTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC to report and recommendations, 235 |
| 2024-11-25 | RESPONSE by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Qirui-US, CY Direct US, Legee Tech, iphoto digit, Pixel Lighting to status report 233 Legee Tech Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Severance Proposal |
| 2024-11-19 | OBJECTIONS by Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 to status report 233 per Order [DE 236] |
| 2024-11-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's status report 233, which proposes severing this case into a total of five cases, consistent with the Court's recent ruling on Defendants Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder 230. However, Plaintiff's status report does not indicate whether its severance proposal is opposed. By 11/25/2024, the Defendants listed in 2-4 of Plaintiff's status report shall file a response to Plaintiff's severance proposal. Additionally, Defendants listed in 2-4 of Plaintiff's status report have each filed a motion to dismiss. Regardless of whether the Court severs these Defendants from this action, the Defendants' motions to dismiss will remain live, as those motions raise arguments beyond improper joinder. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-11-18 | REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court recommends that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 68 be denied as to Responding Defendants (identified in footnote 2), excluding the Bonded Defendants (identified in footnote 1), for the reasons discussed in this Report and Recommendation. In accordance with Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties are advised that "[w]ithin 14 days after being served with a copy of [the report and recommendation], a party may serve and file specific written objections to the proposed findings and recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 14 days after being served with a copy." See also 28 U.S.C § 636(b)(1)(C). Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 11/18/2024. Mailed notice |
| 2024-11-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: This is a "Schedule A" case, which is a type of lawsuit typically filed against a group of sellers whose assumed names are listed on an attachment to the complaint, usually called "Schedule A." Oakley, Inc. v. P'ships & Unincorporated, 2021 WL 308882, at *1 (N.D. Ill. January 30, 2021). Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for default judgment as to certain Defendants. R. 225, Mot. Default; R. 226, Memo. Default. The Court denies the motion 225 without prejudice for the following reasons. First, Plaintiff asserts it is entitled to a reasonable royalty of $10,000 plus 10% of defaulting Defendants sales of unauthorized products pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 284. In support of the $10,000 licensing fee, Plaintiff cites to the Declaration of Sason Gabay. Decl. Gabay 8. However, Plaintiff does not explain its calculation of the 10% of defaulting Defendants' sales of unauthorized products. Instead, Plaintiff i |
| 2024-11-15 | STATUS Report by Pathway IP LLC Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-11-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendant Lanyuantai's status report regarding motion to recover damages for Plaintiff's wrongful TRO 231. For the reasons stated in the status report, Defendant Lanyuantai's motion 227 is terminated as moot. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-11-12 | STATUS Report REGARDING MOTION TO RECOVER DAMAGES FOR PLAINTIFFS WRONGFUL TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF 227) by Lanyuantai Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-11-08 | ORDER: Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/8/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-11-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons in the attached Order, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder 105. Enter Order. Defendants Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct have been misjoined in this action, and the claims against those Defendants are severed from this action. The Clerk of Court is directed to open a new case as to Defendant Luxsure-US and Defendant Yarrashop Direct and to assign such action to this Court. Pathway is required to pay the filing fee. Based on this ruling, by November 15, 2024 the Court orders Pathway to file a status report as to whether it will be proceeding as to the remaining Defendants in one action or grouping Defendants in separate actions. Based on that status report, the Court will set new deadlines for an Amended Complaint in this original action, and any severed actions. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-11-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendant Lanyuantai's motion to recover damages for wrongful temporary restraining order 227. Plaintiff may file a response, limited to four pages, by 11/12/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-11-06 | MOTION by Defendant Lanyuantai TO RECOVER DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-11-05 | (Declaration of Sason Gabay) |
| 2024-11-05 | (Exhibit A) |
| 2024-10-31 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is certain Defendants' motion for scheduling conference and expedited hearing on Defendant's motions to dismiss for misjoinder and dissolve preliminary injunction 218. Certain Defendants have also filed a notice of motion for presentment for hearing on 11/05/2024 at 4:00 p.m. 222 The Court reminds the parties that pursuant to its Standing Order, "[p]arties are not to schedule motion presentment hearings. Parties should not contact the Court's Courtroom Deputy about scheduling a motion presentment hearing. If a party believes a motion presentment hearing is necessary, the party must file a motion requesting a hearing on the docket, which must indicate whether the opposing party opposes the motion, and setting forth a brief explanation as to why a hearing is necessary." As the Court understands the purpose of certain Defendants' motion for hearing was to bring to the Court's attention |
| 2024-10-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants' Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Amended Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder 105. The Court has received inquiry as to the status of ruling on the pending motion. As to the label of the pending motion as an "emergency," pursuant to the Court's Standing Order, the Court hears "emergency motions only in exceptional circumstances after making a preliminary determination of whether an actual emergency exists. Emergency matters must be of such a nature that a delay in hearing them would cause serious harm to one or more of the parties." Here, Defendants' motion requests dismissal for misjoinder. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21, "[m]isjoinder of parties is not a ground for dismissing an action. On motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party. The court may also sever any claim against a party." Accordingly, |
| 2024-10-30 | NOTICE of Motion by Jianyin Liu for presentment of motion for hearing, 218 before Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 11/5/2024 at 04:00 PM. |
| 2024-10-29 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: The Court has reviewed the Motion for Scheduling Conference and Expedited Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder and Dissolve Preliminary Injunction 218. The Court further notes that the Motion for Status Conference 216 was stricken by the Moving Defendants ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai and AIXIANGPAI, see 217. In the pending Motion 218, the Moving Defendants seek a status conference regarding the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction 116, Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder 111 and Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction 104, but those motions are before the District Judge. Therefore, this Motion 218 is improperly presented before the Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff must notice the Motion 218 for presentment before Judge Valderrama. Mailed notice |
| 2024-10-29 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC Under Rule 41(a)(1) Lanyuantai (Defendant 53) without prejudice |
| 2024-10-28 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Weilisi, Kaiess by Ziqi Yu |
| 2024-10-21 | MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge 116, MOTION by Defendant ATKTTOP Directto Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 100] Against Defendant Presented before Magistrate Judge 104, MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge 111 for Status Conference Pursuant to Local Rules 16.1 Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-10-21 | NOTICE by Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge 116, MOT 216 of Striking Filing of Motion for Status Conference [DE 216] |
| 2024-10-21 | MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, ATKTTOP Direct, AIXIANGPAI 101089568 for hearing re MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge 116, MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge 111 for Status Conference Pursuant to Local Rules 16.1 Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-10-16 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC Under Rule 41(a)(1) DONGDONG (Defendant 82) with prejudice |
| 2024-10-09 | REPLY by Kaiess to response in opposition to motion, 206 TO DISMISS FILED BY DEFENDANT KAIESS AND DEFENDANT WEILISI |
| 2024-10-04 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Weilisi, Kaiess |
| 2024-10-04 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants BLights, EESTOREAMZ, Herrflk, STALLY, Sensyne, Vlogging US, Wanfaau, WisaKey, XITENG TECH by Stevenson Moore |
| 2024-10-02 | SUPPLEMENT to report of rule 26(f) planning meeting 152 (Joint) |
| 2024-10-02 | REPLY by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit to Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, 124 |
| 2024-10-02 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit |
| 2024-10-02 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai |
| 2024-09-30 | (Exhibit A- FLSD Order on Improper Joinder Differentiatng Bose) |
| 2024-09-25 | RESPONSE by Pathway IP LLCin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Defendant Kaiess Defendant Weilisi; MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED OR FOR MISJOINDER Presented before District Judge 140 |
| 2024-09-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File its Reply in Support of its Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction Instanter 204 is granted. Mailed notice |
| 2024-09-21 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for leave to file Plaintiff's Reply in Support of its Motion for Entry of a Preliminary Injunction Instanter Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-09-21 | REPLY by Pathway IP LLC to response in opposition to motion, 130, Response, 134, response in opposition to motion, 132, response in opposition to motion, 131, response in opposition to motion, 133, Response, 137 |
| 2024-09-20 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants 129 and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 2024-09-18 | (Exhibit 1) |
| 2024-09-18 | (Exhibit 2) |
| 2024-09-17 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants 122 and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 2024-09-17 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants 121 and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 2024-09-17 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim by Certain Defendants 120 and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 2024-09-17 | Plaintiff's ANSWER to counterclaim By Certain Defendants 118 and Affirmative Defenses by Pathway IP LLC |
| 2024-09-17 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Unicucp US |
| 2024-09-17 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Woputne-US |
| 2024-09-17 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Okshopping |
| 2024-09-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the unopposed motion, Defendant Jianjin's first motion for extension of time to answer or otherwise respond to complaint 189 is granted. Defendant Jianjin's responsive pleading due 09/30/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-17 | RULE 16 SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 9/17/2024. Mailed notice |
| 2024-09-16 | REPLY by ATKTTOP Direct to MOTION by Defendant ATKTTOP Directto Dissolve Preliminary Injunction [DE 100] Against Defendant Presented before Magistrate Judge 104 |
| 2024-09-16 | MOTION by Defendant jianjin company for extension of time to file answer (Unopposed) Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-09-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motions, Defendants' unopposed motions for withdrawal are granted 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187. Attorney Ping Gu of Zhong Lun Law Firm is withdrawn as counsel for Defendants, iphotoxx, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, RUIHOTOR, catchpiccus, HiFocusiUS, QiHuichang, ShiQiaoShang, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, Jinsnow, and ShutterLight. Defendants remain represented by attorneys at Glacier Law LLP. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-14 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-13 | (Certificate of Service) |
| 2024-09-13 | MOTION by Attorney Ping Gu to withdraw as attorney for iphotoxx. No party information provided Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-09-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Reply Brief 173 is granted. Plaintiff shall file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 9/20/24. Mailed notice |
| 2024-09-12 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for extension of time to file response/reply as to order on motion for preliminary injunction, text entry, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, 99 Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-09-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, Defendants' unopposed motion for withdrawal is granted 166. Attorneys Cameron Nelson and Jacqueline Brousseau of Greenberg Traurig LLP are withdrawn as counsel for Defendants, iphotoxx, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, RUIHOTOR, catchpiccus, HiFocusiUS, QiHuichang, ShiQiaoShang, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, Jinsnow, and ShutterLight. Defendants remain represented by attorneys at Glacier Law LLP. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Status hearing held on 9/11/24. The Court reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Proposed Discovery Schedule 152. By 9/16/24, the parties shall submit a revised Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order to the Court at Proposed_order_gilbert@ilnd.uscourts.gov that incorporates the discovery schedule set by the Court and the additional paragraphs discussed on the record. By 10/2/24, the parties shall file a supplement to their Rule 26 Report 152 that includes the information specified in paragraph 7(g) of the appendix to Local Patent Rule 3.5(b). The parties shall file an updated joint status report on the parties' progress with the Rule 26 Scheduling Order by 12/3/24. Mailed notice |
| 2024-09-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 68 is opposed by several Defendants, and the Court entered a briefing schedule as to those Defendants opposing entry of a preliminary injunction 99. The Court refers the opposed motion for preliminary injunction to Magistrate Judge Gilbert. This Minute Entry does not impact the preliminary injunction order previously entered against non-appearing Defendants 100. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for leave to file amended notification of affiliates under seal 163. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Counter-Plaintiff Bekada's notice of dismissal 160. Pursuant to the terms of the notice of dismissal, Counter-Plaintiff Bekada dismisses with prejudice any and all counterclaims against Counter-Defendant Pathway IP LLC. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-11 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by BLights, EESTOREAMZ, Herrflk, STALLY, Sensyne, Vlogging US, Wanfaau, WisaKey, XITENG TECH |
| 2024-09-11 | MOTION by Attorney Cameron Nelson and Jacqueline Brousseau to withdraw as attorney for HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx. No party information provided Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-09-10 | (Exhibit C) |
| 2024-09-10 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC Amended Notification of Affiliates |
| 2024-09-10 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for leave to file Amended Notification of Affiliates Under Seal Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-09-10 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pathway IP LLC (Amended) (Redacted) |
| 2024-09-10 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx by Tianyu Ju |
| 2024-09-10 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Bekada to Counter- Defendant Pathway IP LLC |
| 2024-09-10 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx |
| 2024-09-09 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx by Ruoting Men |
| 2024-09-08 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx by Wei Wang |
| 2024-09-07 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx by Dandan Pan |
| 2024-09-07 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx by Xionghui Murong |
| 2024-09-07 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, catchpiccus, iphotoxx by Tao Liu |
| 2024-09-06 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS by Tao Liu |
| 2024-09-06 | REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Pathway IP LLC |
| 2024-09-06 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC as to Defendant 59 |
| 2024-09-06 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Luxsure-US, Yarrashop Direct |
| 2024-09-05 | NOTICE by AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai of Affiliation Disclosure Statement |
| 2024-09-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Plaintiff's unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to Defendant No. 4 ATKTTOP Direct's motion to dissolve the preliminary injunction 141. Plaintiff's response to Defendant Atktopp's motion to dissolve is now due 9/10/2024' Defendant Atktopp's reply is now due 9/17/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Defendants Weilisi and Kaiess's motion to dismiss 140 : Plaintiff's response due on or before 9/25/2024; Defendant's reply due 10/9/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Defendants Yarrashop Direct and Luxsure-US's motion for leave to file Declaration 1, 2, 4, and 5 to their response in opposition to Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction under seal 138, as those documents include information related to Defendants' financial details. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-04 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC Under Rule 41(a)(1) NAICEE (Def. 78) |
| 2024-09-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants' Yarrashop Direct and Luxsure-US's motion for leave to file under seal 138. For the reasons stated in the motion, Defendants' Yarrashop Direct and Luxsure-US are granted leave to file Declaration 1, 2, 4, and 5 to their response opposing Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction under seal. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants' AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, and iphoto digit's motion for leave to file Exhibit 1 to Defendants' response in opposition to Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction under seal 136. For the reasons stated in the motion, Defendants are granted leave to file Exhibit 1 to their response opposing Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction under seal. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-09-04 | (Exhibit C) |
| 2024-09-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pathway IP LLC for extension of time to file response/reply as to text entry, 107, motion for miscellaneous relief, 104 (Unopposed) Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-09-03 | (Exhibit 1) |
| 2024-08-30 | [封存] (Declaration Declaration 5) |
| 2024-08-30 | MOTION by Defendants Luxsure-US, Yarrashop Direct to seal Declaration 1, 2, 4 and 5 TO DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-08-30 | (Declaration Declaration 5) |
| 2024-08-30 | MOTION by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit for leave to file EXHIBIT 1 TO DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION UNDER SEAL Presented before District Judge |
| 2024-08-30 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Defendants AMTLJ-US, Auriani-US, BONFOTO, CY Direct US, Lanyuantai, Legee Tech, NovoNost-us, PANYINYING, Pixel Lighting, Qirui-US, iphoto digit EXHIBIT 1 TO DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION |
| 2024-08-30 | (Exhibit 3) |
| 2024-08-30 | (Exhibit A) |
| 2024-08-30 | (Exhibit) |
| 2024-08-30 | Exhibit |
| 2024-08-30 | (Exhibit) |
| 2024-08-30 | ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM filed by XITENG TECH, Vlogging US, Sensyne, Herrflk, WisaKey, EESTOREAMZ, Wanfaau, BLights, STALLY against Pathway IP LLC. by XITENG TECH, Vlogging US, Sensyne, Herrflk, WisaKey, EESTOREAMZ, Wanfaau, BLights, STALLY |
| 2024-08-29 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Pathway IP LLC Under Rule 41(a)(1) Peyou US Ltd (Def. 51) with prejudice |
| 2024-08-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants Legee Tech (Def. No. 1), BONFOTO (Def. No. 5), PANYINYING (Def. No. 15), Qirui-US (Def. No. 16), iphoto digit (Def. No. 48), Lanyuantai (Def. No. 53), Pixel Lighting (Def. No. 57), AMTLJ-US (Def. No. 61), Auriani-US (Def. No. 65), CY Direct US (Def. No. 72), and NovoNost-us (Def. No. 79) (collectively, the Moving Defendants) motion to dismiss or for misjoinder 124. The Court sets the following briefing schedule: Plaintiff's response due 09/18/2024; Moving Defendants' reply due 10/02/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-08-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, and ATKTTOP Direct's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction 116, which has been improperly noticed before the Magistrate Judge. The same group of Defendants have a pending motion to sever 111, and the Court previously set a briefing schedule on that motion to sever 114. The Court vacates the briefing schedule on the pending motion to sever 114 and sets the following combined briefing schedule on both motions. Plaintiff must file one combined response, and Defendants must file one combined reply. Plaintiff's combined response in opposition to Defendants' motion to sever and motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction due 09/18/2024; Defendants' combined reply in support of its motion to sever and motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction due 10/02/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-08-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Defendants Luxsure-US and Yarrashop Direct's Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder (Amended) 105. Plaintiff has filed a response 115. Defendants may file a reply by 09/05/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-08-27 | Exhibit 1 |
| 2024-08-27 | ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand Answer to Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Bekada against Pathway IP LLC. by Bekada |
| 2024-08-27 | ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand Answer to Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Unicucp US against Pathway IP LLC. by Unicucp US |
| 2024-08-27 | ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand Answer to Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Okshopping against Pathway IP LLC. by Okshopping |
| 2024-08-27 | ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand Answer to Amended Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Woputne-US against Pathway IP LLC. by Woputne-US |
| 2024-08-27 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Bekada by Jeffrey Edward Schiller |
| 2024-08-27 | ANSWER to amended complaint, Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM filed by Luxsure-US, Yarrashop Direct against Pathway IP LLC. by Luxsure-US, Yarrashop Direct |
| 2024-08-26 | ANSWER to amended complaint and Affirmative Defenses by HiFocusiUS, Jinsnow, Lixinshunyi, Photo Guard, QiHuichang, RUIHOTOR, ShiQiaoShang, ShutterLight, VividNWUS, XingBoom, XuanXiuUS, catchpiccus, iphotoxx |
| 2024-08-24 | MOTION by Defendants Aixiangpai, AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-08-23 | RESPONSE by Pathway IP LLCin Opposition to MOTION by Defendants Luxsure-US, Yarrashop Direct for order Emergency Motion to Dismiss for Improper Joinder (Amended) Presented before District Judge 105 |
| 2024-08-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: The Court is in receipt of certain Defendants' motion to dismiss for misjoinder 111. Plaintiff's response is due on or before 09/12/2024. Certain Defendants' reply is due on or before 09/19/2024. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-08-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order 109 is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with Local Rule 37.2. Plaintiff apparently received the discovery requests in question on or about 8/13/24. Those requests sought expedited responses within 7 days, or by 8/20/24. It sent a letter to the Neewer Group of Defendants on 8/19/24, approximately 6 days after service, objecting to the requests and asking for a conference the next morning, 8/20/24. Plaintiff complains that it had not received a response to its letter by the time it filed its Motion 109 on 8/20/24, likely less than 24 hours after the letter was sent. On these facts, which are laid out in Plaintiff's own Motion 109, Plaintiff failed to comply with Local Rule 37.2 which is a basis to strike the Motion. In addition, the parties have been ordered "to file a joint proposed scheduling order appropriate for this case in accordance with Rule 16( |
| 2024-08-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Misjoinder 111 should be designated before the District Judge. Mailed notice |
| 2024-08-21 | MOTION by Defendants AIXIANGPAI 101089568, ATKTTOP Direct, Aixiangpai to sever Presented before Magistrate Judge |
| 2024-08-21 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant AIXIANGPAI 101089568 by Jianyin Liu |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
