1:25-cv-00389
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-09-16 | MAIL RETURNED, for document #[28] sent to Alexander Whang returned as undeliverable, return to sender. No new contact information received; therefore future mailings will not be sent until a new address is provided to the Clerk's Office using a Notification of Change of Address. |
| 2025-05-09 | FULL SATISFACTION of Judgment as to a certain defendant |
| 2025-05-05 | MAILED Copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 5/2/2025 to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-05-02 | ENTERED JUDGMENT on 5/2/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-05-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: No remaining Defendant has responded to Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion [48] is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by Plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, Plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of Plaintiff's marks and copyrights irreparably harms Plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. The Clerk is directed to return the surety bond posted. Enter Final Judgment Order. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-04-25 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Sydney Paige Fenton on behalf of Blink Industries Ltd. |
| 2025-04-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment against the remaining Defendants. The remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before May 1, 2025. If no objections are filed by that date, the court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by April 28, 2025. A hearing may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Mailed notice |
| 2025-04-24 | DECLARATION of Martin F. Trainor regarding memorandum in support of motion[49] |
| 2025-04-24 | MEMORANDUM by Blink Industries Ltd. in support of motion for entry of default, motion for default judgment[48] |
| 2025-04-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for entry of default, MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for default judgment as to all Defendants |
| 2025-04-18 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Blink Industries Ltd. as to a certain defendant |
| 2025-03-28 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Blink Industries Ltd. as to certain Defendants |
| 2025-03-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for an extension of time [43] is granted. A status report or motion for default judgment is now due by April 24, 2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-03-21 | STATUS Report by Blink Industries Ltd. |
| 2025-03-21 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for extension of time to file Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment |
| 2025-03-21 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Blink Industries Ltd. as to a certain defendant |
| 2025-03-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: By March 21, 2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report regarding next steps in this case. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for default judgment, it should be filed by that date, and if Plaintiff moves for default judgment as to all Defendants, no status report need be filed. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-03-04 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 3/4/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-03-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [33] is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk that certain Defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of Plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors Plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [37] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents, but no |
| 2025-02-28 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Blink Industries Ltd. as to certain Defendants |
| 2025-02-27 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Sydney Paige Fenton on behalf of Blink Industries Ltd. |
| 2025-02-26 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Blink Industries Ltd. as to a certain defendant |
| 2025-02-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion [33] for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, Plaintiff must serve all remaining Defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no Defendant appears and objects by March 3, 2025. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining Defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. For the reasons stated in the Court's orders entering the TRO, the TRO is extended until the Court adjudicates the motion for a preliminary injunction. See H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 843-45 (7th Cir. 2012). Because this extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under FRCP 65(b), this ext |
| 2025-02-25 | MEMORANDUM by Blink Industries Ltd. in support of motion for preliminary injunction[33] |
| 2025-02-25 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for preliminary injunction as to certain Defendants |
| 2025-02-25 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Blink Industries Ltd. as to The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule A, on 2/25/2025, answer due 3/18/2025. |
| 2025-02-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion to extend the TRO [29] is granted. The TRO is extended through February 28, 2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-02-11 | MEMORANDUM by Blink Industries Ltd. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[29] |
| 2025-02-11 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2025-02-05 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 10,000.00 posted by Blink Industries Ltd. (Document not imaged) |
| 2025-01-31 | ORDER for expedited discovery Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 1/31/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-01-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-01-30 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. Exhibit 2, Parts 1-13 regarding declaration[22] |
| 2025-01-30 | DECLARATION of Paul Varley regarding memorandum in support of motion[21] |
| 2025-01-30 | MEMORANDUM by Blink Industries Ltd. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[20] |
| 2025-01-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order including a Temporary Injunction, and a Temporary Assest Restraint, as to Certain Defendants1 |
| 2025-01-30 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. Schedule of Defendants |
| 2025-01-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court is not prepared to grant the request for a temporary restraining order based on the information contained in the template Plaintiff filed [see [11]], so the motion for a TRO [12] is denied without prejudice to renewal. The majority of the dates listed in the 'last date collected column' are from 2023 or the first half of 2024. The most recent dates are from September and early October 2024. For some but not all of the 2023 dates, the chart says, "Product still available as of January 22, 2025" and that this statement is an indication of whether defendant is still offering Plaintiff's copyrighted works for sale. But the Court cannot verify this information. Indeed, many of the included links in the submission do not take the court to active webpages that appear to still offer the offending material for sale. In short, the information provided does not persuade the Court that without prompt relief, Plaintiff will suffer "imm |
| 2025-01-22 | MEMORANDUM by Blink Industries Ltd. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[16] |
| 2025-01-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) |
| 2025-01-22 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. Exhibit 2, Parts 1-3 regarding declaration[14] |
| 2025-01-22 | DECLARATION of Paul Varley regarding memorandum in support of motion[13] |
| 2025-01-22 | MEMORANDUM by Blink Industries Ltd. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief[12] |
| 2025-01-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, and Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-01-22 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. Schedule of Defendants |
| 2025-01-15 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff should review the Court's standing order on "Schedule A" Cases, available at https://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/judge-info.aspx?IuUaWzNcEoPr4PHl9tvcGaMUezk8AnJ1 under the "Case Procedures" tab. Please note that the table's requirements were revised on October 10, 2024. As explained there, Plaintiff must complete and file the template linked on that page before the Court will consider granting any motion for preliminary injunctive relief. The submission must also provide a listing of all prior Schedule A cases filed in any court in the United States in which Plaintiff was a plaintiff, and a listing of any of the defendants included in the Schedule A in this case that Plaintiff has previously named as a defendant in any prior complaint or Schedule A case. Finally, by filing the template, Plaintiff certifies that Plaintiff has not used any of the screenshot evidence supplied in support of a motion for a TRO in this case in any pri |
| 2025-01-14 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-01-14 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. by Alexander Whang |
| 2025-01-14 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. by Sydney Paige Fenton |
| 2025-01-14 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. by Martin Francis Trainor |
| 2025-01-14 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Blink Industries Ltd. |
| 2025-01-14 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-01-14 | MOTION by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. for Leave to File Certain Documents Under Seal |
| 2025-01-14 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Blink Industries Ltd. Schedule A regarding complaint[1] |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
