1:25-cv-01035
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-03-11 | ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed by the courtroom deputy on 03/11/2025. Emailed notice |
| 2025-03-11 | DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 03/11/2025. Emailed notice |
| 2025-03-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the absence of a timely answer, the motion for default judgment 31 is granted. Statutory damages are awarded in the amount of $15,000 per Defendant. Given the willfulness established by the default, a permanent injunction is entered. A separate AO-450 judgment shall be entered. The status hearing of 03/28/2025 is vacated. Civil case terminated. Emailed notice |
| 2025-03-07 | NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for default judgment 31 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 3/13/2025 at 08:30 AM. |
| 2025-03-07 | MEMORANDUM by Intersport Corp. in support of motion for default judgment[31] |
| 2025-03-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. for default judgment as to the Defendants Identified in [Amended] Schedule A |
| 2025-02-18 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 02/18/2025. Emailed notice |
| 2025-02-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: In light of the continued applicability of the circumstances that justified entry of the TRO, the motion for preliminary injunction 25 is granted. Given the answer deadline of 03/06/2025, the tracking status hearing of 02/21/2025 is reset to 03/28/2025 at 8:30 a.m., but to track the case only (no appearance is required, the case will not be called). Instead, the parties shall file the joint initial status report by 03/21/2025. The parties must file a joint initial status report with the content described in the ***ATTACHED*** status report requirements (do ***not*** use templates from other cases). Plaintiff must still file the report even if Defendants have not responded to requests to craft a joint report. If not all Defendants have been served, then Plaintiff must complete the part of the report on the progress of service. Also, counsel (or the parties, if proceeding pro se) must carefully review Judge Chang's Case Management Proced |
| 2025-02-13 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Intersport Corp. as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 2/13/2025, answer due 3/6/2025. |
| 2025-02-13 | NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for preliminary injunction 25 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 2/21/2025 at 08:30 AM. |
| 2025-02-13 | MEMORANDUM by Intersport Corp. in support of motion for preliminary injunction 25 |
| 2025-02-13 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. for preliminary injunction |
| 2025-02-11 | INJUCTION BOND in the amount of $ 4,000 posted by Intersport Corp. (Document not scanned). |
| 2025-02-07 | (PUBLIC VERSION) SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 02/07/2025. Emailed notice |
| 2025-02-07 | [封存] SEALED TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 02/07/2025. Emailed notice |
| 2025-02-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Edmond E. Chang: (1.) On joinder, Amended Schedule A satisfies Civil Rule 18 because the four Defendants use identical product images, product details (with the same five-bullet-point listing of many words), and ad text of the same 27 words in the same, non-grammatical sequence. (2.) The Plaintiff's motion [16] for temporary restraining order and other relief is granted. An order will be entered under seal separately. Although the Court again expresses its concern about restraining assets before judgment, Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund, 527 U.S. 308, 331 (1999), the Plaintiff does invoke a statutory remedy, namely, an accounting of profits (that is, disgorgement of profits) under 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), which is not a mere common-law equitable claim and thus could allow for pre-judgment restraint. Indeed, trademark owners need only "prove defendant's sales only; defendant must prove all elements of costs or deduction claimed." 15 U.S.C |
| 2025-02-04 | Presentment for [16] Exparte motion and NOTICE of Motion by Keith A. Vogt for presentment of motion for leave to file[14], motion for leave to file excess pages[15] before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 2/10/2025 at 08:30 AM. |
| 2025-02-04 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. Memorandum Establishing that Joinder is Proper |
| 2025-02-04 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. Sealed Exhibit 2, Declaration of Kurt Rios regarding memorandum in support of motion, [17] |
| 2025-02-04 | MEMORANDUM in support of [16] Exparte motion |
| 2025-02-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-02-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. for leave to file under seal |
| 2025-02-04 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. [Amended] Schedule A to the Complaint [1] and Schedule A [2] |
| 2025-01-31 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 2025-01-31 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-01-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Yanling Jiang |
| 2025-01-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Monica Rita Martin |
| 2025-01-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Christopher Romero |
| 2025-01-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 2025-01-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Adam Grodman |
| 2025-01-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Keith A. Vogt |
| 2025-01-30 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-01-30 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O Schedule A to Complaint [1] |
| 2025-01-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O by Yi Bu |
| 2025-01-30 | COMPLAINT filed by Intersport Corp. d/b/a Wham-O; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23024242. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
