1:25-cv-03483
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-07-21 | MAILED trademark report with order dated 7/21/2025 to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-07-21 | ENTERED JUDGMENT Signed on 7/21/2025: Civil case terminated. |
| 2025-07-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and for default judgment, 39, is denied. The Seventh Circuit has found the existence of specific personal jurisdiction in suits against online retailers, but only when the defendant has shipped the allegedly infringing products to the forum state. In NBA Properties v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614 (7th Cir. 2022), the Seventh Circuit held that specific jurisdiction exists where, "when an order was placed, [the defendant] filled the order, intentionally shipping an infringing product to the customer's designated Illinois address," id. at 624 (emphasis added); see also id. at 625 ("HANWJH knew it could be subject to the jurisdiction of Illinois when it shipped a counterfeit product to the forum."). In Curry v. Revolution Laboratories, LLC, 949 F.3d 385 (7th Cir. 2020), the Seventh Circuit "held jurisdiction proper where a defendant's website offered the forum state as a 'ship-to' option, the defendant sent |
| 2025-07-16 | MEMORANDUM by Intersport Corp. Supplemental Memorandum in Response to the July 2, 2025 Order [Dkt. No. 43] |
| 2025-07-02 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 7/2/2025: |
| 2025-06-30 | STATUS Report by Intersport Corp. |
| 2025-06-30 | DECLARATION of Michael A. Hierl regarding motion for default judgment 39 |
| 2025-06-30 | MEMORANDUM by Intersport Corp. in support of motion for default judgment 39 |
| 2025-06-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. for default judgment as to Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default and Default Judgment Against the Defendants Identified in Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-06-30 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Intersport Corp. |
| 2025-06-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 6/30/2025, addressing how plaintiff seeks to proceed with this litigation. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-06-06 | STATUS Report by Intersport Corp. |
| 2025-06-06 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Elizabeth Aubree Miller on behalf of Intersport Corp. |
| 2025-06-06 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Intersport Corp. as to The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto on 6/6/2025, answer due 6/27/2025. |
| 2025-06-06 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto (qrtr,) |
| 2025-05-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report by 6/6/2025, addressing the status of service and how plaintiff seeks to proceed with this litigation. |
| 2025-05-12 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Martha M. Pacold on 5/12/2025: |
| 2025-05-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery, 26, is granted in part and denied in part. Enter Order. |
| 2025-05-06 | EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. Exhibit 2 to Rios Declaration |
| 2025-04-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: On 4/21/2025, the court explained that if plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 4/28/2025. 24. To date, plaintiff has not done so. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, plaintiff must file its exhibits publicly on the docket by 5/7/2025. |
| 2025-04-28 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-04-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages, 20, is granted. 2. Plaintiff's motion for electronic service of process, 21, is granted. The court finds that electronic service of process is proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3). Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it effectively communicates the pendency of this action to defendants. To the extent that the motion requests service of process of any temporary restraining order in this case, service is not necessary because this court has already denied the motion for a TRO. 24. |
| 2025-04-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motions for leave tof ile under seal, 19, and for a temporary restraining order and for expedited discovery, 21, are denied. Plaintiff seeks leave to file under seal so that plaintiff may obtain a temporary restraining order freezing the defendants' assets before revealing the defendants' identities. See 19. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, 2023 WL 8807254, at *4 (N.D. Ill., Dec. 20, 2023) (citing Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo S.A. v. All. Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308 (1999)); see also Shenzhen Yihong Lighting Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-1560, |
| 2025-04-17 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. Exhibit 2 to Rios Declaration |
| 2025-04-17 | MEMORANDUM by Intersport Corp. in support of motion for temporary restraining order, 21 |
| 2025-04-17 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. for temporary restraining order Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Entry of a Temporary Restraining Order, Including a Temporary Injunction, a Temporary Asset Restraint, Expedited Discovery, and Service of Process by Email and/or Electronic Publication |
| 2025-04-17 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. for leave to file excess pages Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Page Limitation |
| 2025-04-17 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2025-04-17 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-04-17 | AMENDED complaint by Intersport Corp. against The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto |
| 2025-04-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: 1. In its response memorandum, plaintiff "requests leave to file an Amended Complaint to include a smaller subset for defendants." 13 at 3. The court therefore construes plaintiff's response memorandum as a motion for leave to amend. The motion for leave to amend is granted. An amended Schedule A is already filed on the docket. 15. 2. In light of the amended Schedule A, which names three defendants, 15, the court finds that plaintiff has discharged its obligation to show that joinder requirements have been met. See 12. 3. The amended Schedule A is filed on the docket under seal. 15. Plaintiff must, by 4/17/2025, file a properly supported motion to seal. 4. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages, 7, is granted. Plaintiff may file a brief (no longer than 30 pages) in support of a motion for temporary restraining order, motion for expedited discovery, and motion for alternative service. If plaintiff seeks to move on these grou |
| 2025-04-09 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. Exhibit A regarding memorandum 14 |
| 2025-04-09 | MEMORANDUM by Intersport Corp. Plaintiff's Memorandum in Support of Joinder |
| 2025-04-08 | RESPONSE by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. Memorandum in Response to Order of April 2, 2025 [Dkt. No. 12] |
| 2025-04-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 4/9/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the sepa |
| 2025-04-02 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 2025-04-02 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-04-01 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O |
| 2025-04-01 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O Sealed Schedule A |
| 2025-04-01 | MOTION by Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2025-04-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O by John Wilson |
| 2025-04-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 2025-04-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 2025-04-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O by Michael A. Hierl |
| 2025-04-01 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-04-01 | COMPLAINT filed by Intersport Corp. d/b/a WHAM-O; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23286885. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
