1:25-cv-05390
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-06-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: By July 8, 2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report regarding next steps in this case. If Plaintiff intends to file a motion for default judgment, it should be filed by that date, and if Plaintiff moves for default judgment as to all Defendants, no status report need be filed. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-06-12 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Garyck Truls Arntzen as to The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 6/12/2025, answer due 7/3/2025. |
| 2025-06-05 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Wisgofre US Direct |
| 2025-06-04 | ORDER Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 6/4/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-06-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: In light of the amended complaint, the motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery 19 is granted. The prior motion 13 is denied as moot. Separate order to issue. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-06-03 | AMENDED complaint by Garyck Truls Arntzen against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 2025-05-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder [Dkt. 15] and determines, within its discretion, that it has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of nearly 200 defendants is proper in this matter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the Court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Here, Plaintiff surmises that identical and substantially similar infringing clothing suggests coordinated action [Dkt. 15 at 2-3] But overall, the arguments fall short of establishing a logical relationship among the defendants. At bottom, Plaintiff simply asserts that all of them participated i |
| 2025-05-23 | MEMORANDUM set deadlines, 12 by Garyck Truls Arntzen Supplemental Memorandum in Response to Minute Order 12 |
| 2025-05-16 | MEMORANDUM in Support of 13 Exparte Motion |
| 2025-05-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining nearly 200 defendants in a single action. By May 23, 2025, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by May 23, 2025 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice. |
| 2025-05-16 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC. |
| 2025-05-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen by Yi Bu |
| 2025-05-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen by Yanling Jiang |
| 2025-05-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen by Monica Rita Martin |
| 2025-05-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen by Christopher Romero |
| 2025-05-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen by Adam Grodman |
| 2025-05-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen by Keith A. Vogt |
| 2025-05-15 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-05-15 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen Schedule A to Complaint 1 |
| 2025-05-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Garyck Truls Arntzen by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 2025-05-15 | COMPLAINT filed by Garyck Truls Arntzen; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23489617. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
