1:25-cv-06563
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-08-29 | ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-08-29 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: Because the Court dismissed the complaint without prejudice for misjoinder, R. 12, and because the plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, this case is closed. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-07-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: For the reasons set forth in Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A," 24-cv-09401, docket entry no. 27, and for the following reasons, the Court dismisses the complaint without prejudice for misjoinder. The plaintiff contends that bringing "49 separate causes of action against 49 separate defendants would be unfair, inefficient, and would result in needlessly duplicative work for multiple judges." That is not true here. As mentioned in Toyota, the work is the same for the Court. Further, pursuant to Local Rule 40.3(b)(2), which requires the plaintiff to indicate the number of this case and the name of the judge to whom it was assigned, means that all 49 cases will likely be heard by this Court. The plaintiff further posits that the Court should consider "the coordination amongst the e-commerce defendants." But the plaintiff only points to notices sent of recently |
| 2025-07-02 | MEMORANDUM set deadlines, 10 by Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc. re Propriety of Joinder |
| 2025-06-20 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 49 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. See, e.g., Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 9401, Dkt. 27 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2024). Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder on or before July 2, 2025. Alternatively, by the same date, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint naming one or more defendants; however, if the plaintiff names multiple defendants, the plaintiff mu |
| 2025-06-18 | NOTICE of Motion by Trevor William Barrett for presentment of motion to seal 8 before Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel on 6/25/2025 at 09:30 AM. |
| 2025-06-18 | MOTION by Plaintiff Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc. to seal |
| 2025-06-13 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-06-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc. by Trevor William Barrett |
| 2025-06-12 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc. |
| 2025-06-12 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-06-12 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc. -- (Unredacted) Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2025-06-12 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc. -- (Unredacted) Complaint |
| 2025-06-12 | COMPLAINT filed by Neman Brothers & Associates, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23618364. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
