1:25-cv-06657
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-08-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: The court has received plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal, 37. This dismissal took effect without court intervention. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); Waetzig v. Haliburton Energy Servs., 145 S. Ct. 690, 694 (2025). Civil case terminated. |
| 2025-08-07 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Nicholas D'Amario of all remaining defendants |
| 2025-08-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 8/21/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the sep |
| 2025-08-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages, [10], is granted. Plaintiff's motion for a temporary restraining order, [7], is denied. Plaintiff seeks entry of an ex parte temporary restraining order. However, his attorney has not "certifie[d] in writing any efforts made to give notice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(B). Additionally, while counsel's declaration attempts to show "the reasons why [notice] should not be required," it appears to rely on the premise that any temporary restraining order would freeze defendants' assets to ensure they can pay any money judgment plaintiff may obtain. "The Supreme Court has made clear that courts lack the power to issue an asset freeze at the beginning of a case, unless that party is seeking equitable monetary relief." Zorro Productions, Inc. v. Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, No. 23-cv-5761, |
| 2025-07-09 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Nicholas D'Amario Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 2025-07-09 | MEMORANDUM by Nicholas D'Amario in support of motion for temporary restraining order[7] |
| 2025-07-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Nicholas D'Amario for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-07-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Nicholas D'Amario to seal document sealed document, [9] |
| 2025-07-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Nicholas D'Amario for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-07-01 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-06-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff Nicholas D'Amario to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 2025-06-30 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Nicholas D'Amario by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 2025-06-30 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-06-30 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Nicholas D'Amario Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2025-06-30 | COMPLAINT filed by Nicholas D'Amario; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23685881. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
