1:25-cv-08123
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-04-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas to seal document sealed document[28], sealed document[30] |
| 2026-04-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas for leave to file excess pages |
| 2026-04-27 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas Exhibit 1 to Supplemental Delcaration of David Gulbransen |
| 2026-04-27 | SUPPLEMENT to motion for temporary restraining order[26], memorandum in support of motion, [27] Supplemental Declaration Support of Jurisdiction |
| 2026-04-27 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 2026-04-27 | MEMORANDUM by Samantha Rekas in support of motion for temporary restraining order[26] |
| 2026-04-27 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas for temporary restraining order |
| 2026-04-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for TRO [17] is denied without prejudice in light of the Seventh Circuit's opinion in Liu v. Monthly, No. 25-2074, --- F.4th ----, 2026 WL 880018 (7th Cir. Mar. 31, 2026). In Liu, the Court vacated the district court's entry of default judgment because the "evidence upon which the district court relied for establishing personal jurisdiction showed only that it was possible to order the defendants' products and have them shipped to Illinois, not that such sales took place." Id. at *2. Specifically, the evidence in Liu consisted "of screenshots of [defendant seller's] website showing the checkout page with the infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total, but not a completed purchase." Id. Relying on NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 620 (7th Cir. 2022) and Curry v. Revolution Lab'ys, LLC, 949 F.3d 385, 400 (7th Cir. 2020), the Seventh Circuit explained that such evidence was insuf |
| 2026-02-12 | SUPPLEMENT to order on motion for temporary restraining order, order on motion to seal document, order on motion for leave to file excess pages, terminate deadlines and hearings, set deadlines/hearings, [23] Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Electronic Service |
| 2026-02-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [20] and motion for leave to file excess pages [21] are granted. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order [17] including a request for service by email is entered and continued. On or before 2/12/26, plaintiff shall file a supplemental brief (not to exceed five pages) setting forth whyin plaintiff's viewthe Second Circuit's recent ruling in Smart Study Co., Ltd v. Shenzhenshixindajixieyouxiangongsi does not preclude electronic service in this matter. See Smart Study, No. 24-313, 2025 WL 3672740, at *4-6 (2d Cir. Dec. 18, 2025) (concluding that email service on Chinese defendants was prohibited by the Hague Convention and thus improper under Rule 4). The previously set 12/12/25 tracking status hearing is stricken and reset to 2/27/26 at 9:00 a.m. (to track the case only, no appearance is required). Mailed notice |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-11-18 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-11-18 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas to seal document sealed document 19 |
| 2025-11-18 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 2025-11-18 | MEMORANDUM by Samantha Rekas in support of motion for temporary restraining order 17 |
| 2025-11-18 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-11-03 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-10-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: The Court has reviewed the plaintiff's supplemental memorandum on joinder 14 and determines, within its discretion, that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 89 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed.R.Civ.P. 20(a)(2). See Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D.Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"); H-D U.S.A. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", No. 21-CV-01041, 2021 WL 780486, at *2 (N.D.Ill. Mar. 1, 2021) ("The Seventh Circuit has recognized the broad discretion that district courts have in remedying misjoinder, so long as the court's decision avoids unnecessary harm to the parties."). Beyond alleging that the almost 90 defendants are infringing upon plaintiff's copyrights, which alone is insufficient to establish the |
| 2025-09-25 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas Supplemental Memo in Support of Joinder |
| 2025-08-29 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings: This case has been re-assigned to the calendar of Judge Jeffrey I. Cummings. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal 5 11 and motion for leave to file excess pages 12 are granted. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 8 is entered and continued generally. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of almost 90 defendants in this case. See, e.g. Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D.Ill. 2020). By 9/26/25, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Tracking status hearing set for 10/31/2 |
| 2025-07-24 | MEMORANDUM by Samantha Rekas in support of motion for temporary restraining order 8 |
| 2025-07-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-07-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-07-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas to seal document sealed document, 10, sealed document 2 |
| 2025-07-24 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 2025-07-17 | MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case Reassigned to the Honorable Jeffrey I Cummings. The Honorable Robert W. Gettleman no longer assigned to the case pursuant 28 USC 294(b). Mailed notice |
| 2025-07-17 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-07-16 | MOTION by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas to seal document sealed document 2 |
| 2025-07-16 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Samantha Rekas by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 2025-07-16 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-07-16 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Samantha Rekas Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2025-07-16 | COMPLAINT filed by Samantha Rekas; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23760342. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
