1:25-cv-08797
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-12-02 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-12-01 | DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 12/1/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-12-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion [42] is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's marks irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendants (plaintiff has failed to seek an accounting of profits), the value of plaintiff's brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $50,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages. Plaintiff has also certified and established [45] that it provided |
| 2025-11-20 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. regarding terminate hearings, set/reset hearings, [44] |
| 2025-11-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion [42] for entry of default and default judgment against all remaining defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 11/26/2025. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 11/26/2025. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. A tentative default judgment hearing is set for 12/ |
| 2025-11-18 | MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for default judgment[42] |
| 2025-11-18 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for default judgment as to |
| 2025-10-27 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 10/27/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-10-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [35] is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendant will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court finds that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [39] that it provided electronic notice to defendant of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been filed on beh |
| 2025-10-23 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. regarding terminate hearings, set/reset hearings, [38] |
| 2025-10-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion [35] for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all remaining defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 10/26/2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 10/26/2025. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. Status hearing set for 10/28/2025 at 9:15 a.m. is converted to a tentative preliminary injunction hearing. Mailed notice |
| 2025-10-21 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. as to Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 10/21/2025, answer due 11/11/2025. |
| 2025-10-21 | MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for preliminary injunction[35] |
| 2025-10-21 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for preliminary injunction |
| 2025-10-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order [32] is granted. For the reasons stated in Plaintiff's Memorandum [32] and Plaintiff's status report [31], the Court finds good cause to extend the temporary restraining order an additional 14 days to 10/28/2025. Plaintiff shall file a preliminary injunction motion if appropriate no later than 10/21/2025. Telephone status hearing is set for 10/28/2025 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice |
| 2025-10-14 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for extension of time of TRO |
| 2025-10-14 | STATUS Report by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. |
| 2025-10-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time of TRO [27] is denied because Plaintiff failed to post the required bond. Mailed notice |
| 2025-10-09 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $10,000 posted by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. (Document not scanned) |
| 2025-10-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Status hearing set for 10/14/2025 is stricken. Mailed notice |
| 2025-10-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff did not post the $10,000 bond as ordered by the Court. See Doc. 24. By 10/10/2025, Plaintiff shall post the required $10,000 bond with the Clerk of the Court. Mailed notice |
| 2025-10-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for extension of time of TRO |
| 2025-10-06 | SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 2025-10-05 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) Nanjing Bewe Int'l Trading Co., Ltd. and all other Defendants identified in the Complaint by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. |
| 2025-09-30 | [封存] Sealed Temporary Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 9/30/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-09-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery and motion for electronic service of process [18], motion for leave to file under seal [22], and motion for leave to filed excess pages [21], are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that were defendant to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendant could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. Accordingly, subject to unsealing at an appropriate time, plaintiff may file under seal the documents identified in the motion to seal. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall also be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motions cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceed |
| 2025-09-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document[20] |
| 2025-09-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-09-04 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Exhibit 1 to Delcaration of David Gulbransen |
| 2025-09-04 | MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[18] |
| 2025-09-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-09-04 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Amended Schedule A |
| 2025-09-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff failed to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. The Court, within its discretion, determines that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 363 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Estee Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"); H-D U.S.A. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 2021 WL 780486, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 1, 2021) ("The Seventh Circuit has recognized the broad discretion that district courts have in remedying misjoinder, so long as the court's decision avoids unnecessary harm to the parties."). Within its discretion, on this record, the Court finds that plaintiff has failed to meet its burden to show that joinder is proper |
| 2025-08-19 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials. (jn,) |
| 2025-08-19 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. (jn,) |
| 2025-08-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal [7] [11], plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order [8], and plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages [12] are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of 363 defendants in this case. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 8/25/2025, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a single defendant or a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. A telephone status hearing is set for 10/8/2025 at 9:15 a.m. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 |
| 2025-08-04 | MEMORANDUM by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. in support of motion for temporary restraining order[8] |
| 2025-08-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-08-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-08-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document[2], sealed document, [10] |
| 2025-08-04 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Exhibit 1 to Delcaration of David Gulbransen |
| 2025-07-28 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 2025-07-28 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 2025-07-28 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. |
| 2025-07-28 | USPTO Cover Sheet by Pure Body Logistics, Inc. |
| 2025-07-28 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-07-28 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Pure Body Logistics, Inc. Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2025-07-28 | COMPLAINT filed by Pure Body Logistics, Inc.; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23804721. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
