1:25-cv-09003
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-08-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: This case is dismissed for misjoinder. The dismissal is without prejudice. The plaintiff argues that all of defendants' alleged infringing conduct arises out of the same transaction or occurrence because the defendants use the same platform and sales mechanism, sell identical products, misuse the plaintiff's mark, and identify the same manufacturer of their products. The reasoning set forth in Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 9401, Dkt. 27 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2024) covers the first three issues. As for the defendants listing the same manufacturer on their respective websites, that only suggests a common supplier. Contrary to the plaintiff's suggestion, it does not show coordinated distribution. More importantly, it does not trace back to a common transaction or occurrence. At best, it alleges a series of parallel infringements by separate defendants. The Court notes that the plaintiff mentions that the wallets |
| 2025-08-11 | ENTERED JUDGMENT. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-08-06 | MEMORANDUM by Yu Wang in support to Joinder |
| 2025-08-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jeremy C. Daniel: The plaintiff has filed a complaint alleging infringement by 73 defendants. This case follows a pattern common to "Schedule A" cases where plaintiffs allege that defendants employ similar methods and "work in active concert" to infringe plaintiffs' intellectual property. But experience has shown that not all defendants named in a Schedule A case work together. More importantly, experience has shown that joinder under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 is rarely appropriate in Schedule A cases. See, e.g., Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 9401, Dkt. 27 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 18, 2024). Accordingly, the Court raises the propriety of joinder and requires the plaintiff to file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder on or before August 15, 2025. Alternatively, by the same date, the plaintiff may file an amended complaint naming one or more defendants; however, if the plaintiff names multiple defendants, the plaintiff |
| 2025-07-31 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-07-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Yu Wang by Zhiwei Hua |
| 2025-07-31 | [封存] SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Yu Wang Genuine Listing regarding complaint 1 |
| 2025-07-31 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Yu Wang Schedule A regarding complaint 1 |
| 2025-07-31 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Yu Wang Trademark Registration regarding complaint 1 |
| 2025-07-31 | COMPLAINT filed by Yu Wang; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23820483. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
