1:25-cv-09549
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-11-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to conduct expedited discovery, [24], is granted subject to the following limitations. Upon Plaintiff's request, any third party with actual notice of this Order who is providing services for the Defendant, or in connection with the Defendant Internet Store, including, without limitation, any online marketplace platforms such as Temu, LLC ("Temu") (the "Third Party Providers"), shall, within seven (7) calendar days after receipt of such notice, provide to Plaintiff expedited discovery, limited to copies of documents and records in such person's or entity's possession or control sufficient to determine: the identities and locations of Defendant, its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and any persons acting in active concert or participation with them, including all known contact information and all associated e-mail addresses. Plaintiff's motion for service by email and publication, [26], is denied. Pl |
| 2025-08-25 | DECLARATION of Konrad Sherinian regarding motion for miscellaneous relief 26 |
| 2025-08-25 | MEMORANDUM by Sigmaxgo LLC in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 26 |
| 2025-08-25 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sigmaxgo LLCService by E-Mail and Publication on a Webite |
| 2025-08-25 | DECLARATION of Depeng Bi regarding motion for discovery 24 |
| 2025-08-25 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sigmaxgo LLC for discovery Expedited Discovery |
| 2025-08-25 | Exh 1 to Dec of Feifei Ju by Sigmaxgo LLC |
| 2025-08-25 | Schedule A to Complaint by Sigmaxgo LLC |
| 2025-08-25 | Exhibit 1 to Complaint by Sigmaxgo LLC |
| 2025-08-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: Plaintiff's motion to seal, 17, is denied. Plaintiff's sealed documents, 2, 3, 13, are stricken. The motion asks for the documents to be filed under seal to allow for ex parte relief. As explained in the court's previous minute entry, 18, however, the court finds that ex parte relief is not warranted. Accordingly, there is no basis to allow the documents to be filed under seal. If plaintiff wishes to proceed with this case, it should file its documents publicly on the docket by 9/2/2025. |
| 2025-08-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: By 9/3/2025, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this case should not be dismissed or severed for improper joinder. Plaintiff is advised of the following: First, "[o]n motion or on its own, the court may at any time, on just terms, add or drop a party." Fed. R. Civ. P. 21(a). Second, sua sponte review of the propriety of joinder in Schedule A cases is a regular practice of courts in this district because plaintiffs "routinely file these multi-defendant cases. using cookie-cutter complaints that allege in a conclusory manner that 'on information and belief' each infringing defendant is inter-connected with the others." Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule "A", No. 24-cv-1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *1 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Third, "[c]ourts generally find that claims against different defendants arose out of the same transaction or occurrence only if there is a logical relationship between the sepa |
| 2025-08-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Martha M. Pacold: (1) Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages, 14, is granted. (2) Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order, 8, is denied. (a) The motion seeks an ex parte TRO, but plaintiff's attorney has not "certifie[d] in writing any efforts made to give notice." Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(B). (b) Plaintiff has not adequately established personal jurisdiction. "For a TRO. to be valid, the issuing Court must have personal jurisdiction over the defendants." Am. Bridal & Prom Indus. Ass'n, Inc. v. The P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 192 F. Supp. 3d 924, 930 (N.D. Ill. 2016). The Seventh Circuit has, in some cases, found the existence of specific personal jurisdiction in trademark, copyright, and patent infringement suits against online retailers, but only when the defendant has shipped the allegedly infringing products to the forum state. See, e.g., NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 622-23 (7th Cir. |
| 2025-08-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sigmaxgo LLC to seal document sealed document 13, sealed document 3, sealed document 2 |
| 2025-08-14 | MINUTE entry before the Executive Committee: Case reassigned to the Honorable Martha M. Pacold for all further proceedings pursuant to Local Rule 28:294(b). Mailed notice. |
| 2025-08-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin: The Court requires that any motion for a temporary restraining order and/or asset freeze is accompanied by a declaration from an attorney of record that provides the following information. First, to demonstrate the immediate harm necessary to grant the drastic remedy of an ex parte temporary restraining order, the declaration must confirm that each named defendant has sold or offered to sell the allegedly infringing product(s) within the last two months and describe the evidence supporting this confirmation. Generally, evidence that a defendant has sold or offered to sell the infringing products within the last two months may include: (1) screenshots of the listings collected within the last two months; (2) screenshots older than two months with an attestation that the listings reflected in the screenshots have been checked within the last two months and were active; or (3) evidence of a purchase by a customer in Illinois within the l |
| 2025-08-13 | MEMORANDUM by Sigmaxgo LLC in support of motion for temporary restraining order 8 |
| 2025-08-13 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sigmaxgo LLC for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-08-13 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-08-13 | MOTION by Plaintiff Sigmaxgo LLC for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-08-13 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Sigmaxgo LLC Exh 1 to Dec Feifei Ju (stores 1-6) |
| 2025-08-13 | DECLARATION of Feifei Ju regarding motion for temporary restraining order 8 |
| 2025-08-13 | DECLARATION of Depeng Bi regarding complaint, 1 |
| 2025-08-13 | DECLARATION of Konrad Sherinian regarding motion for temporary restraining order 8 |
| 2025-08-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SIGMAXGO LLC by Depeng Bi |
| 2025-08-12 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SIGMAXGO LLC by Konrad Val Sherinian |
| 2025-08-12 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-08-12 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SIGMAXGO LLC Exh 1 to Complaint - IP Asserted |
| 2025-08-12 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SIGMAXGO LLC Sealed Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2025-08-12 | COMPLAINT filed by SIGMAXGO LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23873129. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
