1:25-cv-11244
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-11-07 | SEALED ORDER for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery and Service of Process by E-Mail and/or Electronic Publication. Signed by the Honorable April M. Perry on 11/7/2025. (jcc,) |
| 2025-11-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's motion for Expedited Discovery and Electronic Service of Process [18] is granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with an online marketplace defendant. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify defendant. Because electronic service is being permitted, Plaintiff is directed to effectuate that service within 30 days or to file a status report with the Court within 30 days explaining why it is unable to do so. The Court strikes the motion hearing set for 11/12/2025. Enter order. Mailed notice. (jcc,) |
| 2025-09-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff was directed to file a motion to seal by 9/23/2025 13 and has not done so. Additionally, Plaintiff has now filed an amended Schedule A not under seal. 14 The Court assumes this mean that Plaintiff no longer wishes to seal the original Schedule A filed in this case. The Clerk of Court is therefore directed to unseal 2. Mailed notice. (jcc,) |
| 2025-09-19 | Amended Schedule A to the Complaint 1 and Schedule A 2 by Sheena Lynn Pike |
| 2025-09-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: It appearing that the case filed is a "Schedule A" case, Plaintiff is directed to the Court's standing order on its website directing the filing of the Court's Schedule A Template within 14 days. Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2) of joining 20 defendants to this action. See, e.g, Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). Plaintiff is reminded that "[c]ourts in this district generally agree that alleging that multiple defendants have infringed on the same copyright in the same way does not create the substantial evidentiary overlap required to find a similar transaction or occurrence." See Roadget Bus. Pte. Ltd. v. Individuals, Corps, Ltd. Liab. Companies, Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23-cv-17036, 2024 WL 1858592, at *6 ( |
| 2025-09-18 | EMAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-09-18 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike by Yanling Jiang |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike by Monica Rita Martin |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike by Christopher Romero |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike by Adam Grodman |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike by Keith A. Vogt |
| 2025-09-17 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-09-17 | DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike Schedule A to Complaint 1 (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/24/2025). |
| 2025-09-17 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Sheena Lynn Pike by Yi Bu |
| 2025-09-17 | COMPLAINT filed by Sheena Lynn Pike ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24073760. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
