1:25-cv-11575
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-10-08 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's memorandum on joinder [12] and determines, within its discretion, that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 13 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 27, 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the Court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Overall, the arguments fall short of establishing a logical relationship among the defendants. The Court is not persuaded that any one defendant's infringement is linked to the next defendant's infringement sufficient to show they are part of the same transaction, occurrence, |
| 2025-09-25 | MOTION by Plaintiff Givenchy SA for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-09-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Givenchy SA to seal Schedule A, Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Nicolas Lambert, and Plaintiffs Memorandum Establishing That Joinder Is Proper |
| 2025-09-24 | MOTION by Plaintiff Givenchy SA for electronic service of process. |
| 2025-09-24 | COMPLAINT filed by Givenchy SA ; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24107519. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
