1:25-cv-11789
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-01-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Defendant's motion for an extension of time [41] is granted. Because the court prefers to resolve disputes on their merits, Defendant's responsive pleading is now due by February 12, 2026. The status deadline set by docket entry [38] is stricken. An answer, stipulation of dismissal, or a motion for entry of default and default judgment is now due by February 11, 2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-01-09 | MOTION by Defendant Ostoo for extension of time to file answer |
| 2026-01-05 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order Signed by the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins on 1/5/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-01-05 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [29] is granted, which the Court now considers unopposed because no defendant filed a notice of objection by the established deadline. For the reasons set forth in plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, as well as the reasons provided by plaintiff in connection with the Court's earlier entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction, including that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [32] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this case and provided a link to a website containing relevant case documents. Enter preliminary injunction order. The Clerk is requested to unseal any previously-sea |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-12-15 | Preliminary Injunction |
| 2025-12-03 | Order on Motion for Exparte |
| 2025-10-27 | Order on Motion to Seal |
| 2025-10-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for a temporary restraining order, expedited discovery and for electronic service [16] is granted in part and denied in part. The motion is granted to the extent that Plaintiff may pursue expedited discovery and serve Defendant electronically. It is denied as to a temporary restraining order without prejudice to renewal. According to the memorandum, personal jurisdiction over Defendant Ostoo is proper because Oosto "directly targets business activities toward consumers in the United States, including Illinois, by directly offering for sale products into this judicial district as well as through at least the fully interactive, commercial Defendant Internet Store" [Dkt. 16-1 at 9.] The court doubts this is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, at least without more information. Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 2021 WL 825668, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (no personal jurisdiction over a defendant where only connec |
| 2025-10-23 | MOTION by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc. to seal |
| 2025-10-16 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc. -- Second Amended Complaint |
| 2025-10-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The court has reviewed the plaintiff's memorandum on joinder [Dkt. 10] but Plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of more than 50 defendants is proper in this matter under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Plaintiff argues that joinder is proper because the joined Defendants use non-descript seller aliases, use many of the same or similar photographs to market and promote the same kind of counterfeit garments, all operate on Amazon and Walmart, and use the same illegitimate search engine optimization. These similarities, Plainti |
| 2025-10-08 | RESPONSE by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc. to mailed 6 |
| 2025-10-08 | MEMORANDUM by Unicolors, Inc. -- Supplemental Memorandum Establishing Joinder is Proper and Request for Leave to Conduct Expedited Limited Discovery |
| 2025-10-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining more than 50 defendants in a single action. By October 8, 2025, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by October 8, 2025 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice. |
| 2025-09-30 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc. -- (Unredacted) Amended Complaint |
| 2025-09-30 | AMENDED complaint by Unicolors, Inc. against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A |
| 2025-09-29 | MAILED Copyright Request Letter to Plaintiff's counsel Trevor William Barrett. (bi,) |
| 2025-09-26 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Unicolors, Inc. |
| 2025-09-26 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc. by Trevor William Barrett |
| 2025-09-26 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-09-26 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Unicolors, Inc. -- (Unredacted) Complaint |
| 2025-09-26 | COMPLAINT filed by Unicolors, Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24121554. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
