1:25-cv-12595
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-02-05 | MAILED trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA. |
| 2026-02-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [27] is acknowledged. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, this case is dismissed with prejudice. Any or all previously set deadlines/hearings to be struck. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (jcc,) |
| 2026-02-03 | STATUS Report by SS Inc. |
| 2026-02-03 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by SS Inc. as to Defendant OPTICS DEPOT |
| 2026-01-23 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by SS Inc. |
| 2026-01-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Defendant's answer in this case was due on 11/26/2025, and nothing has been filed. Plaintiff is asked to file by 2/3/2026 either a status report or a motion for default judgment. Mailed notice. (jcc,) |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-12-01 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by SS Inc. as to OPTICS DEPOT on 11/5/2025, answer due 11/26/2025. |
| 2025-11-25 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant John Doe |
| 2025-11-25 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff SS Inc. |
| 2025-11-25 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff SS Inc. |
| 2025-11-14 | ORDER for Leave to Conduct Expedited Discovery and Service of Process by E-Mail and/or Electronic Publication. Signed by the Honorable April M. Perry on 11/14/2025. Mailed notice. (jcc,) |
| 2025-11-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's motions for Expedited Discovery [13] and Electronic Service of Process [14] are granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with an online marketplace defendant. Expedited discovery is warranted to identify Defendant. Because electronic service is being permitted, Plaintiff is directed to effectuate that service within 30 days or to file a status report with the Court within 30 days explaining why it is unable to do so. The Court strikes the motion hearing set for 11/19/2025. Enter order. Mailed notice. (jcc,) |
| 2025-11-13 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SS Inc. by James Edward Judge |
| 2025-11-12 | NOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 13, motion for miscellaneous relief 14 before Honorable April M. Perry on 11/19/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-11-12 | MEMORANDUM by SS Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 14 |
| 2025-11-12 | Miscellaneous Relief |
| 2025-11-12 | Miscellaneous Relief |
| 2025-10-24 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's Motion to Seal [9] is granted. Mailed notice. (jcc,) |
| 2025-10-23 | MOTION by Plaintiff SS Inc. for leave to file Documents Under Seal |
| 2025-10-23 | Redacted AMENDED complaint by SS Inc. against SS Inc. |
| 2025-10-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable April M. Perry: Plaintiff's motion to seal 4 is granted in part. Plaintiff may not seal its own identity in the complaint or use a pseudonym in the case caption. There are no exceptional circumstances that would justify allowing Plaintiff to conceal its own identity. As the Seventh Circuit has explained, "[w]e have repeatedly voiced our disfavor of parties proceeding anonymously, as anonymous litigation runs contrary to the rights of the public to have open judicial proceedings and to know who is using court facilities and procedures funded by public taxes. To proceed anonymously, a party must demonstrate exceptional circumstances that outweigh both the public policy in favor of identified parties and the prejudice to the opposing party that would result from anonymity." Doe v. Village of Deerfield, 819 F.3d 372, 376-77 (7th Cir. 2016); see also Doe v. Loyola Univ. Chicago, 100 F.4th 910, 913 (7th Cir. 2024). Plaintiff's motion identifies circumstances |
| 2025-10-16 | MAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 2025-10-16 | MAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2025-10-15 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff SS Inc. Unredacted Complaint |
| 2025-10-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff SS Inc. for leave to file documents under seal |
| 2025-10-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff SS Inc. by Ying Chen |
| 2025-10-15 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-10-15 | COMPLAINT filed by SS Inc.; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24201937. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
