1:26-cv-00558
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RELEASE BOND Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 7/2/2026. Mailed notice |
| 2026-06-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Pursuant to Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal [47] and Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this matter is dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants with each party to bear its own costs and fees. All pending motions, hearings, and deadlines are stricken. Civil case terminated. Plaintiff's motion for release of bond obligations [48] is granted. The ten-thousand dollar ($10,000) bond posted by Plaintiff, including any applicable or earned interest, is hereby released to Plaintiff's counsel: Marjorie Ouyang, One Park Plaza, #600, Irvine, CA 92614. Mailed notice |
| 2026-06-26 | MOTION by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd for release of bond obligation |
| 2026-06-24 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd |
| 2026-06-24 | STATUS Report by Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd |
| 2026-06-17 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff failed to file the status report due by 6/16/2026. Plaintiff is directed to file a status report with an update on the case by 6/24/2026. Mailed notice |
| 2026-06-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: By 6/16/2026, Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on this case. Mailed notice |
| 2026-05-21 | Declaration of Mandy Wu In Support of Plaintiff's Supplemental Status Repo |
| 2026-05-11 | REGISTRY Deposit Information Form by Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd. (Received at the Intake Counter on 05/11/2026) |
| 2026-05-04 | DECLARATION of MANDY WU IN RESPONSE TO THE COURT'S MINUTE ORDER DOCKET NO.39 |
| 2026-05-04 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd by Mingzi Ouyang |
| 2026-04-27 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for Preliminary Injunction [38], motion for Entry of an Order Directing the Clerk to Issue Summons [37], and motion for Alternative Service [34] are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff did not post the $10,000 bond as ordered by the Court. See Doc. [26]. Further, upon review of the complaint and the Preliminary Injunction submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the issue of whether the Court has specific personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Evidence "that it was possible to order the defendants' products and have them shipped to Illinois," including screenshots of the defendant's "website showing the checkout page with the infringing product, a Chicago shipping address, and the estimated total," but without evidence of a completed purchase is insufficient. Liu v. Monthly, 170 F.4th 1090, 1093 (7th Cir. 2026). By 5/4/2026, plaintiff shall file supplemental evidence showing a sale wi |
| 2026-04-22 | Memorandum In Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction |
| 2026-04-21 | MOTION by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd For Entry of an Order Directing the Clerk to Issue Summons |
| 2026-04-21 | REGISTRY Deposit Information Form by Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd (Received at the Intake Counter on 4/21/26.) |
| 2026-04-21 | Declaration of Marjorie Ouyang |
| 2026-04-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's ex parte motion 32 to direct the clerk to issue summons and extend the temporary restraining order seeks to extend the sealed TRO entered on 3/25/2026 to maintain the status quo by an additional period of 7 days until 4/29/2026. Rule 65 dictates that a temporary restraining order cannot exceed 14 days, although the court may extend it "for a like period" for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2). On 4/3/2026, this Court extended the TRO an additional 14 days until 4/22/2026. Doc. 28. Plaintiff's current request exceeds the maximum 28-day limit for a TRO. If a TRO extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Rule 65(b), the extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 844 (7th Cir. 2012). A preliminary injunction requires notification to the opposing party. See F |
| 2026-04-20 | MOTION by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Order directing Clerk to issue summons and extending TRO to April 29, 2026 |
| 2026-04-20 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Telephone status hearing set for 4/22/2026 is stricken. Mailed notice |
| 2026-04-12 | [封存] SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) he Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd |
| 2026-04-09 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) The Parties identified in Schedule A by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd |
| 2026-04-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 27 is granted. The Court finds good cause to extend the temporary restraining order an additional 14 days to 4/22/2026. Plaintiff shall file a preliminary injunction motion if appropriate no later than 4/15/2026. Telephone status hearing set for 4/8/2026 is stricken and reset to 4/22/2026 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice |
| 2026-04-02 | MOTION by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd to Extend Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2026-03-25 | TEMPORARY Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 3/25/2026. Mailed notice |
| 2026-03-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's renewed ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, and expedited discovery 19 is granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that were defendant to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's requested preliminary injunctive relief, there is a significant risk that defendant could destroy relevant documentary evidence and hide or transfer assets beyond the reach of the Court. The Temporary Restraining Order being entered along with this minute order shall be placed under seal. In addition, for the purpose of the motion cited above, plaintiff's filings support proceeding on an ex parte basis at this time. Specifically, and as noted above, were defendant to be informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, the Court finds that it is likely that their assets and websites would be redirected, thus defeat |
| 2026-03-08 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Second Amended Complaint |
| 2026-03-05 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff failed to file an unredacted version of the Second Amended Complaint under seal and submit a proposed temporary restraining order. By 3/12/2026, Plaintiff shall file an unredacted version of the Second Amended Complaint under seal and submit a proposed temporary restraining order to the Court's proposed order inbox. Mailed notice |
| 2026-02-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: By 2/27/2026, Plaintiff shall file an unredacted version of the Second Amended Complaint under seal and submit a proposed temporary restraining order to the Court's proposed order inbox. Mailed notice |
| 2026-02-06 | (Exhibit 2) |
| 2026-02-06 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Memorandum In Support Of Plaintiff's Renewed Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2026-02-06 | SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Plaintiff's Renewed Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2026-02-06 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Updated Schedule A related to Second Amended Complaint 16 |
| 2026-02-06 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Exhibit 1 related to Second Amended Complaint 16 |
| 2026-02-06 | SECOND AMENDED complaint by Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 2026-02-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's memorandum on joinder 13 and determines, within its discretion, that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of 6 defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 27, 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the Court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Overall, the arguments fall short of establishing a logical relationship among the defendants. The Court is not persuaded that any one defendant's infringement is linked to the next defendant's infringement sufficient to show they are part of the sam |
| 2026-01-27 | (Exhibit 2) |
| 2026-01-27 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Supplemental Memorandum Establishing That Joinder is Proper, Pursuant to Docket Entry 9 |
| 2026-01-27 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Updated Schedule A related to Amended Complaint 10 |
| 2026-01-27 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Exhibit 1 related to Amended Complaint 10 |
| 2026-01-27 | AMENDED complaint by Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd against The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 2026-01-21 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 4 and plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 6 are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of 12 defendants in this case. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 1/27/2026, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a single defendant or a smaller subset of defendants along with its memorandum explaining specifically why each defendant is properly joined to all of the others. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Further, Plaintiff has not requested nor have exceptional circumstances been shown to proceed anonymously. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) ("Th |
| 2026-01-20 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2026-01-16 | [封存] (Exhibit 2) |
| 2026-01-16 | SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd for Tempory Restraining Order |
| 2026-01-16 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd by Mingzi Ouyang |
| 2026-01-16 | MOTION by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd for leave to file under seal |
| 2026-01-16 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Exhibit 1 related to Complaint 1 |
| 2026-01-16 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Changzhou Yichen Trading Co Ltd Schedule A related to Complaint 1 |
| 2026-01-16 | (Civil Cover Sheet) |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
