1:26-cv-01621
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-02-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order 4 is denied without prejudice to renewal. The memorandum submitted does not address the court's personal jurisdiction over any Defendant and the court has its doubts about whether Plaintiff can establish jurisdiction at the time. Rubik's Brand, Ltd. v. The Partnerships, 2021 WL 825668, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 4, 2021) (no personal jurisdiction over a defendant where only connection to the forum was operating an online marketplace that had "the possibility" of shipping to Illinois). Second, temporary restraining orders are extraordinary and drastic remedies that "should not be granted unless the movant, by a clear showing, carries the burden of persuasion." Mazurek v. Armstrong, 520 U.S. 968, 972 (1997). The party seeking such relief must show: (1) it has some likelihood of success on the merits; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law; and (3) it will s |
| 2026-02-13 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining nearly 200 Defendants in a single action. By February 19, 2026, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint naming a single Defendant by February 19, 2026. The motion to seal 2 is denied because there is a strong presumption of openness in judicial proceedings. "Secrecy in judicial proceedings. is disfavored." Mueller v. Raemisch, 740 F.3d 1128, 1135 (7th Cir. 2014). Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-12 | (Exhibit 3) |
| 2026-02-12 | (Schedule A) |
| 2026-02-12 | MOTION by Plaintiff Qian Wu to seal |
| 2026-02-12 | (Civil Cover Sheet) |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
