1:26-cv-03524
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-18 | Order |
| 2026-05-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for electronic service [22] is granted. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective way to communicate with online marketplace defendants. Enter Order Authorizing Electronic Service of Process. Motion hearing set for 5/20/26 [24] is stricken. A status report regarding next steps is due by 6/15/26, if other appropriate relief has not been sought by that date. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2026-05-07 | MOTION by Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood for Electronic Service of Process Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(F)(3) |
| 2026-04-30 | ORDER FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Signed by the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 4/30/2026. Mailed notice |
| 2026-04-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for leave to conduct expedited discovery [18] is granted in part and denied in part. The Court grants Plaintiff's request for expedited discovery as the Court finds that expedited discovery is warranted to obtain Defendant's contact information, but Plaintiff's request for discovery into Defendant's financial information is denied without prejudice. Enter Order Authorizing Expedited Discovery. A status report regarding progress of expedited discovery and proposed next steps in the case is due by 5/21/26, if other appropriate relief has not been sought by that date. Mailed notice |
| 2026-04-09 | Amended Complaint |
| 2026-04-06 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: This case has been assigned to Judge LaShonda A. Hunt. Upon review of the copyright infringement complaint 1, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all 25 defendants under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20. See Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). Indeed, Plaintiff filed a form complaint with generic allegations about coordinated counterfeiting activity between 25 defendants without any details whatsoever, which arguably violates the requirements of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8 and 10. The Court also questions whether Plaintiff has shown that the Court can exercise personal jurisdiction over the defendants. To establish personal jurisdiction, Plaintiff must sufficiently allege that the defendants actually sold the allegedly infringing product to a customer in Illinois. See |
| 2026-04-01 | MAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2026-03-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood by Christopher Romero |
| 2026-03-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood by Monica Rita Martin |
| 2026-03-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood by Cameron Eugene Mcintyre |
| 2026-03-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood by Adam Grodman |
| 2026-03-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood by Yanling Jiang |
| 2026-03-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood by Keith A. Vogt |
| 2026-03-31 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-03-31 | Schedule A to Complaint 1 by Brigid Ashwood |
| 2026-03-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Brigid Ashwood by Yi Bu |
| 2026-03-31 | (Exhibit 1) |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
