1:26-cv-05062
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-06-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion to seal 8 is denied as moot in light of the amended complaint. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-06-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for expedited discovery 26 is granted. Plaintiff is authorized to serve third-party discovery on an expedited basis, with responses due not less than 10 days after service. The requests shall be proportional to the immediate needs of the case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(1). For example, a request for "documents sufficient to show X" is better than a request for "all documents showing X." Plaintiff shall consider what documents it genuinely needs at this early stage and shall consider the burden on third parties. Plaintiff shall work cooperatively with third parties impacted by this Order and make reasonable, good faith efforts to ease the burdens imposed by Plaintiff's request for expedited discovery. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-06-08 | MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to expedite Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery |
| 2026-06-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The motion for reconsideration 24 is granted. Plaintiff may proceed on its amended complaint against Defendants Salmenta and Sarapandan. The clerk shall update the case caption to delete DYL5662 as a party and add the following two Defendants: Salmenta and Sarapandan. Plaintiff must take some action to advance the case by June 18, 2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-06-03 | Exhibit A |
| 2026-05-29 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The court provided Plaintiff until May 22, 2026 to file any motion for electronic service of process or request for early discovery but nothing has been filed. Plaintiff has until June 3, 2026 to take some action to advance the case, otherwise the court will dismiss it for want of prosecution. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-05-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: The court has reviewed Plaintiff's memorandum on joinder 20 and determines that plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden to show that joinder of more than a dozen defendants is proper in this matter under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). See Este Lauder Cosms. Ltd. v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182, 185 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 27, 2020) (noting that "[plaintiff] bears the burden of demonstrating that joinder is proper"). In evaluating the appropriateness of joinder, the court assesses whether a logical relationship exists between defendants through actual evidentiary overlap, not coincidence. Este Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 185. Overall, the arguments fall short of establishing a logical relationship among the defendants. The court is not persuaded that the creation of numerous internet stores by individual Defendants that are designed to appear to be selling genuine CQC products |
| 2026-05-13 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Supplemental Chart |
| 2026-05-13 | (Exhibit 3) |
| 2026-05-13 | SEALED EXHIBIT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Exhibit 2 to Mills Declaration regarding declaration 18 |
| 2026-05-13 | (Exhibit 1) |
| 2026-05-13 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Amended Schedule A |
| 2026-05-13 | (Redline Amended Complaint) |
| 2026-05-07 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Lindsay C. Jenkins: Upon review of the complaint, the Court sua sponte raises the propriety of joining 16 defendants in a single action. By May 13, 2026, plaintiff must file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint by May 13, 2026 with a smaller subset of defendants along with a memorandum explaining why that smaller subset of defendants is properly joined. No motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first consulting the opinion issued in Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025) (Alexakis, J.). Mailed notice. |
| 2026-05-06 | (Request for Reassignment) |
| 2026-05-04 | EMAILED to plaintiff(s) counsel Lanham Mediation Program materials |
| 2026-05-04 | EMAILED Trademark report to Patent Trademark Office, Alexandria VA |
| 2026-05-01 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC Sealed Schedule A |
| 2026-05-01 | MOTION by Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC to seal document Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal |
| 2026-05-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Elizabeth Aubree Miller |
| 2026-05-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by John Wilson |
| 2026-05-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Robert Payton Mcmurray |
| 2026-05-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by William Benjamin Kalbac |
| 2026-05-01 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Revelyst Operations, LLC by Michael A. Hierl |
| 2026-05-01 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-05-01 | Notice of Claims Involving Trademarks by Revelyst Operations, LLC |
| 2026-05-01 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by Revelyst Operations, LLC |
| 2026-05-01 | (Exhibit 1) |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
