1:26-cv-05619
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-07-01 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: The Court's 6/22/26 minute entry is amended to delete the sentence, "Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps the most effective, way to communicate with defendants." Without a showing that the defendants' addresses remain unknown, notwithstanding the exercise of reasonable diligence, this statement is inconsistent with the Seventh Circuit's recent decision in Kangol LLC v. Hangzhou Chuanyue Silk Import & Export Co., 177 F.4th 793, 80102 (7th Cir. 2026). If Plaintiff plans to effect service of process electronically, he must file a motion for electronic service demonstrating that electronic service is proper under Kangol in the circumstances of this case. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
| 2026-07-01 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) BLKWHT Home & Garden by Plaintiff Debbie Cook |
| 2026-06-23 | [封存] SEALED TEMPORARY Restraining Order. Signed by the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 6/23/2026. Notice mailed by Judge's staff |
| 2026-06-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Jorge L. Alonso: Plaintiff's ex parte motions [5] [7] [10] [11] are granted, and no appearance is necessary. The plaintiff's written submissions establish that if defendants were informed of this proceeding before a TRO could issue, assets would likely be redirected, defeating plaintiff's interests in identifying defendants, stopping the infringement, and obtaining an accounting. In addition, the submitted evidence establishes a likelihood of success on the merits, the harm to plaintiff is irreparable and an injunction is in the public interest because infringement interferes with the plaintiff's ability to control its intellectual property. Those rights cannot be fully compensated by money damages. There is no countervailing harm to defendants from an order directing them to stop infringement. Electronic service of process does not violate any treaty and is consistent with due process because it is an effective, perhaps th |
| 2026-06-17 | NOTICE of Motion by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr for presentment of motion to seal document[5], motion for temporary restraining order[7], motion for leave to file excess pages[11], motion to seal document[10] before Honorable Jorge L. Alonso on 6/23/2026 at 09:30 AM. |
| 2026-05-15 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Debbie Cook Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Hugh Bernham |
| 2026-05-15 | Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
| 2026-05-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff Debbie Cook for temporary restraining order |
| 2026-05-15 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2026-05-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff Debbie Cook for leave to file excess pages |
| 2026-05-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff Debbie Cook to seal document sealed document[9] |
| 2026-05-14 | MOTION by Plaintiff Debbie Cook to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 2026-05-14 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Debbie Cook by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 2026-05-14 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-05-14 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Debbie Cook Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2026-05-14 | COMPLAINT filed by Debbie Cook; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25118382. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
