1:26-cv-08367
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-07-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Upon review of the complaint, the Court advises Plaintiff that no motion for an ex parte temporary restraining order should be filed in this matter without counsel first evaluating whether a restraint of assets would capture more than sales from the allegedly infringing products. A court cannot impose an asset restraint "simply to establish a fund from which a later award of money damages can be satisfied." See Banister v. Firestone, No. 17 C 8940, 2018 WL 4224444, at *9 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 5, 2018); see also Wham-O Holding v. The Partnerships, 24 CV 12523, Dkt. 39 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 20, 2025). Mailed notice |
| 2026-07-16 | MAILED copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2026-07-15 | MOTION by Plaintiff Kiki Xue to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 2026-07-15 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Kiki Xue by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 2026-07-15 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2026-07-15 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Kiki Xue Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2026-07-15 | Exhibit Exhibit 1 |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
