2:25-cv-01850
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-03-11 | ORDER DENYING [71] MOTION for Release of Bond Obligation filed by JIE TANG. Counsel for Mr. Tang failed to provide bond as ordered by the Court. See ECF No. 24. Accordingly, the [71] Motion is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 3/11/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2026-03-11 | ORDER that, in light of [70] Stipulation of Dismissal filed by JIE TANG, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 3/11/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2026-03-11 | MOTION for Release of Bond Obligation by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-03-11 | STIPULATION of Dismissal by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-02-25 | Notice of Mediation by RICHART THOMAS ERNSBERGER. Mediation Date 04/01/2026 11 am |
| 2026-02-24 | [封存] UNREDACTED COMPLAINT against LONGYAN BLUE WHALE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., filed by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-02-24 | ORDER DENYING 52 Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction filed by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. On 1/9/2026, the Court granted Mr. Tang's 41 motion for preliminary injunction. See ECF No. 47. In doing so, the Court ordered that the restraint on Defendant's assets previously granted on 12/12/2025, and extended by further Order on 12/18/2025, shall remain in place through the pendency of this litigation. Id. On 2/1/2026, Defendant filed a 52 Motion to Dissolve Preliminary Injunction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), which permits the Court to provide relief from a final judgment, order, or proceeding. Plaintiff opposes the Motion. First, the Court notes that an order for preliminary injunction is an interlocutory order. Doebler's Pennsylvania Hybrids, Inc. v. Doebler Seeds, LLC, 88 F. App'x 520, 522 (3d Cir. 2004) ("A preliminary injunction is an appealable interlocutory order[.]"). Unlike final orders, which are governed by Rule 60(b), a court may reconsider an interlocutory order "even if |
| 2026-02-24 | ORDER indicating that Plaintiff is directed to file the Unredacted Complaint and add all defendants to the Docket in accordance with the Schedule A instructions for filers available on the Court's website. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/24/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2026-02-13 | ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation. Richart Thomas Ernsberger is appointed as mediator. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/13/2026. |
| 2026-02-12 | STIPULATION selecting ADR process by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2026-02-12 | ORDER STRIKING 61 OBJECTIONS to [49-1] Declaration of ZHIYUN JIANG filed by Plaintiff JIE TANG. Plaintiff Jie Tang filed 61 Objections to Defendant's response in opposition to Mr. Tang's motion for preliminary injunction and the attached declaration of Zhiyun Jiang. Pursuant to the Western District of Pennsylvania's Motions Practice and Brief Writing guidance (available at https://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/MotionsPracticeandBriefWriting.pdf), "arguments (and citations to evidentiary support) should be presented in a single document entitled a 'brief' or 'response,' 'in opposition' (if applicable)." As such, the chart format used by Mr. Tang, in which he refutes certain assertions in Defendant's response line by line, is not appropriate for a brief presenting Mr. Tang's position on an issue, which should be coherent on its own and set forth in sentence and paragraph form. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mr. Tang's 61 OBJECTIONS are STRICKEN. Signed by Judge Christy C |
| 2026-02-10 | OBJECTIONS to [49-1] Declaration SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION OF ZHIYUN JIANG IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-02-10 | DECLARATION of Zheng Liu re [58] Brief in Opposition to Motion by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-02-10 | DECLARATION of Zhi Han re [58] Brief in Opposition to Motion by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-02-10 | BRIEF in Opposition re [52] Motion to Modify, filed by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-02-05 | CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: ADR Stipulation identifying neutral and a date certain on which ADR shall occur due by 2/12/2026; Initial Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures to be exchanged by 2/19/2026; Any Motion to Add New Parties due by 4/6/2026; Any Motion to Amend the Pleadings due by 4/6/2026; ADR due by 4/6/2026; Fact Discovery due by 7/6/2026; Confidential Position Letters due by 7/8/2026; Post-Discovery Status Conference set for 7/13/2026 at 9:00 AM via Telephonic Conference before Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/5/2026. |
| 2026-02-05 | Minute Entry for Telephonic Initial Case Management Conference held on 2/5/2026 before Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand. (Court Reporter: None) |
| 2026-02-03 | ORDER re 54 Stipulation Selecting ADR Process. The parties' ADR Stipulation is hereby STRICKEN. The parties are directed to refile an ADR stipulation selecting a date certain for the mediation session that is within sixty (60) days of the Initial Case Management Conference. See ADR Policies and Procedures, Section 3.4.B (available at: https://www.pawd.uscourts.gov/sites/pawd/files/ADR_Policies_and_Procedures_112818.pdf Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/3/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2026-02-02 | STIPULATION selecting ADR process by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-02-02 | Order re: 52 MOTION to Modify by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the Plaintiff shall file a response to the defendant's 52 Motion on or before 2/9/2026. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 2/2/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2026-02-01 | MOTION to Modify by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2026-01-29 | REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. |
| 2026-01-21 | ANSWER to [33] Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-01-09 | RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION to [41] Motion for Preliminary Injunction, filed by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2026-01-09 | ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/5/2026 at 9:00 AM via Telephone Conference before Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand. Rule 26 Meeting to be conducted on or before 1/22/2026. Rule 26 Meeting Report and ADR Stipulation due by 1/29/2026. Confidential Position Letters due by 2/2/2026. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 1/9/2026. |
| 2026-01-09 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Jie Tang's [41] Motion for Preliminary Injunction is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the restraint on Defendants' assets previously granted on 12/12/2025, and extended by further Order on 12/18/2025, shall remain in place up to the total amount of $142,750 through the pendency of this litigation as more fully set forth in the attached Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the $5,000.00 bond posted by Plaintiff shall remain with the Court until a final disposition of this case or until this PI Order is terminated. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 1/9/2026. |
| 2026-01-09 | OPINION re Plaintiff Jie Tang's [41] Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Plaintiff's [41] Motion is GRANTED as more fully stated in the Opinion. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 1/9/2026. |
| 2026-01-08 | DECLARATION OF ZHIYUN JIANG by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2026-01-07 | STATUS REPORT by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-01-07 | Minute Entry for Order to Show Cause Hearing held on 1/6/2026 before Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand. (Court Reporter: Sharon Siatkowski) |
| 2026-01-06 | ORDER re Order to Show Cause Hearing. On 1/6/2026, the Court held an Order to Show Cause Hearing regarding the need for a preliminary injunction. On 12/12/2025, the Court granted the Plaintiff's 7 motion for a temporary restraining order and entered the TRO. ECF No. 24. Defendants represented at the hearing that the TRO resulted in the restraint of approximately $170,000 of Defendants' assets and disrupted Defendants' business operations. Defendants also seek to conduct discovery relating to whether or not a preliminary injunction is warranted. The TRO is set to expire on 1/9/2026. Accordingly, the Court directed the parties to meet and confer about 1) whether the parties stipulate to a modified asset-freeze amount that preserves the status quo while reducing the burden on Defendants until the parties conduct some discovery and the court can rule on the request for a preliminary injunction; and 2) whether Defendants agree to stop sales of the allegedly infringing products pending disco |
| 2026-01-06 | MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-01-05 | ORDER GRANTING 38 Motion to Appear Remotely filed by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. On 12/18/2025, the Court scheduled a Show Cause Hearing re Preliminary Injunction for 1/6/2026 at 1 PM, in person in Courtroom 9B of the Joseph F. Weis, Jr. United States Courthouse in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Now, in the 38 Motion, defense counsel requests permission to appear remotely at the hearing, averring that defense counsels remote participation is necessary due to illness. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 38 Motion is GRANTED, and defense counsel may appear remotely at the hearing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defense counsels participation will be via Zoom, and the Court's Deputy Clerk will provide access information in advance of the hearing. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 1/05/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2026-01-05 | ORDER GRANTING 34 MOTION for Leave to File Defendants' Opposition to Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction filed by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. In their 34 Motion, Defendants request leave to file Opposition papers for the Show Cause Hearing re Preliminary Injunction scheduled for 1/6/2026. Opposition papers were due 12/30/2025. Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b)(1)(B) permits a filing to be made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of excusable neglect. Here, Defendants aver that they appeared and prepared a substantive opposition promptly after becoming aware of the action. In light of the expedited nature of the proceedings, the Court finds that there is good cause to grant the 34 Motion. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' 34 Motion is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 1/05/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2026-01-05 | MOTION to Appear Remotely for January 6, 2026 Show Cause Hearing by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2026-01-05 | ORDER re 20 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to File an Answer. On 11/24/2025, Defendant BSCORP 1, INC. and Plaintiff JUSTIN BROWNFIELD stipulated to an extension of BSCORPs deadline to answer the 1 complaint until 1/8/2026. ECF No. 15. Now, in the 20 Consent Motion, BSCORP requests an extension of its deadline to answer the complaint until 1/28/2026, averring that it is engaged in discussions with Plaintiffs counsel over a 12(b)(6) motion it intends to file and that these discussions may obviate the need for BSCORP to file the motion. BSCORP also represents that Plaintiff consents to the requested extension. Accordingly, the Court finds that good cause exists to grant the requested extension. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 20 Consent Motion is GRANTED and that BSCORP shall respond to the 1 complaint on or before 1/28/2026. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 1/05/2026. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or No |
| 2026-01-05 | REPLY to Response to Motion re [8] Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by JIE TANG. |
| 2026-01-02 | RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION to [27] Order on Motion to Continue, filed by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2026-01-02 | MOTION for Leave to File Defendants Opposition to Order to Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2025-12-30 | ANSWER to Complaint, COUNTERCLAIM against JIE TANG by SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2025-12-30 | NOTICE of Appearance by Mingzi Ouyang on behalf of SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS. |
| 2025-12-30 | Errata re Clerk's Request for Corrective Action, [29] Certificate of Service by JIE TANG. Reason for Correction: Signature on document and filer do not match. |
| 2025-12-30 | PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by JIE TANG |
| 2025-12-26 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by JIE TANG |
| 2025-12-24 | PRAECIPE to Issue Summons by JIE TANG |
| 2025-12-18 | ORDER GRANTING 26 Motion to Continue the Show Cause Hearing and to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff JIE TANG. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Show Cause Hearing re Preliminary Injunction currently set for 12/23/2025 is RESCHEDULED for 1/6/2026 at 1:00 p.m., IN PERSON in Courtroom 9B before Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Opposition papers, if any, shall be filed electronically with the Court and served on Plaintiff's counsel by delivering copies thereof to the office of Aptum Law at 1660 S Amphlett Blvd Suite 315, San Mateo, CA 94402, on or before 12/30/2025. Plaintiff shall file any Reply papers on or before 1/2/2026. Signed by Judge Christy Criswell Wiegand on 12/18/2025. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. |
| 2025-12-17 | Continue |
| 2025-12-05 | Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages |
| 2025-12-05 | Order on Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal |
| 2025-12-04 | Order |
| 2025-12-03 | Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2025-12-03 | Alternative Service |
| 2025-12-01 | MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by JIE TANG. |
| 2025-12-01 | MOTION for attorney ZHENG LIU to Appear Pro Hac Vice, (Filing fee $70, Receipt # APAWDC-9222249) by JIE TANG. |
| 2025-12-01 | MOTION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal by JIE TANG. |
| 2025-12-01 | Disclosure Statement identifying None as corporate parent or other affiliate by JIE TANG. |
| 2025-12-01 | COMPLAINT against SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS (Filing fee, including Administrative fee, $405, receipt number APAWDC-9222124), filed by JIE TANG. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
