1:24-cv-12451
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-02-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and the Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal 13, this action is being dismissed without prejudice as to the only remaining Defendant. All pending motions and deadlines are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-02-17 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Boris Afremov of remaining Defendants |
| 2025-02-11 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file supplemental joinder memorandum [11] is denied. As an initial matter, Plaintiff's counsel, who should be familiar with this Court's procedures, failed to notice the motion for presentment. Any further non-compliant filings by counsel will be summarily stricken. Substantively, the relief sought is inappropriate because the Court did not grant (nor has Plaintiff requested) leave to file a supplemental joinder memorandum. Rather, after reviewing Plaintiff's joinder memorandum [9], the Court entered an order [10] dismissing Defendants 2 through 30 due to improper joinder, allowing the case to proceed as to Defendant 1, and granting Plaintiff until 2/10/25 file certain motions. Because Plaintiff has not sought appropriate relief to proceed with this case against the remaining Defendant, there is no justification for keeping the Defendant's identity under seal and firm case management deadlin |
| 2025-02-10 | MOTION by Plaintiff Boris Afremov for extension of time for Supplemental Memorandum on Joinder |
| 2025-02-03 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: The Court previously entered an order [8] questioning whether Plaintiff had met its burden of establishing that permissive joinder of 30 Defendants in this case was proper under Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Plaintiff was granted leave to file either a supplemental memorandum or an amended Schedule A consistent with that ruling. In response, Plaintiff filed a memorandum in support of joinder [9] arguing that various similarities between Defendants support its conclusory allegation that Defendants' actions arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, but the Court remains unconvinced. See Viking Arm AS v. P'ships & Unincorporated Ass'ns Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105, at *3 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024) (finding that plaintiff had merely identified a "small subset of the 181 defendants who are copycats of Plaintiff's style and each other, but that does not make them all partn |
| 2025-01-16 | SUPPLEMENT to text entry, [8] Supplemental Memo in Support of Joinder |
| 2025-01-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff names 30 Defendants in this single case and anticipates seeking ex parte TRO relief against each of them. However, after reviewing the complaint [1] and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2); Viking Arm AS v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 24 C 1566, 2024 WL 2953105 (N.D. Ill. June 6, 2024). By 1/16/25, Plaintiff must either (a) file a supplemental memorandum that refers to specific facts alleged in its filings and provides citations to specific screenshots associated with each Schedule A Defendant to demonstrate that joinder is proper; or (b) file under seal an amended schedule A with a subset of Defendants, along with an amended declaration that explains how each of these defendants is properly joined with each other and includes labeled exhibits that contain screenshots or |
| 2025-01-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's ex parte motion for leave to temporarily seal documents [5] was not accompanied by the required notice of presentment. As a one-time courtesy, the Court will consider and grant the motion [5]. For future reference, non-compliant motions will be stricken. Schedule A to the Complaint [2] shall remain sealed until further court order. Mailed notice. |
| 2024-12-20 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2024-12-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff Boris Afremov to seal document sealed document[2] |
| 2024-12-04 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Boris Afremov by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 2024-12-04 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2024-12-04 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Boris Afremov Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2024-12-04 | COMPLAINT filed by Boris Afremov; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-22798499. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
