1:25-cv-10825
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2026-05-27 | MAILED Copyright report with certified copy of minute order dated 5/26/2026 to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2026-05-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Pursuant to Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [37] and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), this case is dismissed without prejudice. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-05-22 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Leonid Afremov all remaining defendants |
| 2026-05-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is the Plaintiff's motion for entry of default and default judgment against Defendant To Be-Unique [33]. The Court denies the motion because it cannot find that it has personal jurisdiction over Defendant. "Default judgments rendered without personal jurisdiction are void and, therefore," the Seventh Circuit will "set aside a default judgment as a per se abuse of discretion if the district court that entered the judgment lacked jurisdiction." e360 Insight v. The Spamhaus Project, 500 F.3d 594, 598 (7th Cir. 2007). Although Plaintiff argues that the Court has jurisdiction over Defendant because it has sold infringing products to residents in Illinois, R. [34] at 4, the evidence cited by Plaintiff in support of personal jurisdiction reflects only that Defendant offers the infringing products for sale to residents of Illinois, id. at 3 (citing R. 21-1, Afremov Decl. para. 9). The Court notes that the memorandum cit |
| 2026-05-20 | STATUS Report by Leonid Afremov |
| 2026-05-20 | MEMORANDUM by Leonid Afremov in support of motion for default judgment[33] |
| 2026-05-20 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov for default judgment as to all remaining defendants |
| 2026-05-19 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On 4/14/2026, the Court sua sponte extended the filing of the joint initial status report to be 5/12/2026 [31]. To date, no joint initial status report has been filed. By 5/26/2026, the Court directs the parties to file a joint initial status report as directed in the Court's 3/23/2026 minute entry [27], or if Defendant still has not appeared, then Plaintiff should file an individual status report with proposed next steps for the case. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-14 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Given Defendant's answer deadline of 4/28/2026, the Court sua sponte extends the deadline for the filing of the joint initial status report from 4/20/2026 [27] to 5/12/2026. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-04-07 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leonid Afremov as to Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A on 4/7/2026, answer due 4/28/2026. |
| 2026-04-07 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendant Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 2026-04-06 | [封存] SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) ToBe-Unique by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov |
| 2026-03-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On or before 4/20/2026, the parties shall file a joint initial status report. A template for the Joint Initial Status Report, setting forth the information required, may be found at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/Judges.aspx by clicking on Judge Valderrama's name and then again on the link entitled 'Joint Initial Status Report. Plaintiff must serve this Minute Entry on all other parties. If the defendant(s) has not been served with process by that date, plaintiff's counsel is instructed to file an individual status report indicating the status of service of process by the same deadline. The parties are further ordered to review all of Judge Valderrama's standing orders and the information available on his webpage. Any nongovernmental corporate party that qualifies under the Rules is reminded of the requirement to file a disclosure statement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1/N.D. Ill. Local Rule 3.2. Mailed notice. |
| 2026-02-09 | ORDER ON EXPEDITED DISCOVERY AND ELECTRONIC SERVICE: Before the Court is Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a TRO and other relief [20]. The Court grants in part and denies in part the motion [20]. As stated in this Order, the motion for a TRO and other injunctive relief is denied without prejudice; Plaintiff's motion for expedited discovery is granted in part and denied in part; and Plaintiff's motion for electronic service is granted. Plaintiff has not come close to meeting the exacting standards of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b) to warrant ex parte relief. That is, the Court finds that "the generic copy-and-paste declarations made mostly 'upon information and belief' fall well short of providing 'specific facts' to 'clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss or damage will result,' and also fail to satisfy the certification requirement." Ren et al v. AilunUS, 25-cv-09278 Dkt. 32 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 22, 2025). That is ample reason to deny this extraordinary request. See Eicher Motors L |
| 2026-02-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: Before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal [23]. The Court, like many other courts in this District, is unconvinced that "these commonplace efforts in Schedule A cases to obtain secret relief comport with principles of procedural due process." See Eicher Motors Ltd. v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, 2025 WL 2299593 at *7 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 8, 2025) (Kness, J.); see also Shenzhen Jisu Technology Co. LTD. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, 25-cv-09559 Dkt. No. 10 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 19, 2025) (Hunt, J.). As an initial matter, these infringement cases rarely present exceptional circumstances that would justify sealing the names of all defendants and documents pertaining to their alleged infringing activity, let alone an entire case, even temporarily. "Secrecy makes little sense if the goal of the litigation is to protect rightholders' |
| 2026-02-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov for leave to file excess pages |
| 2026-02-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov to seal document sealed document[19], sealed document[22] |
| 2026-02-05 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 2026-02-05 | MEMORANDUM by Leonid Afremov in support of motion for temporary restraining order[20] |
| 2026-02-05 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov for temporary restraining order |
| 2026-02-05 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov Schedule A to Amended Complaint |
| 2026-02-05 | AMENDED complaint by Leonid Afremov against Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A |
| 2026-01-28 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: On 10/21/2025, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's case without prejudice for misjoinder [12]. Plaintiff was directed to amend its complaint by 11/3/2025 to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint named more than one defendant, Plaintiff was directed to simultaneously file a memorandum in support of joinder. On 11/3/2025, Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file a memorandum in support of joinder [13]. Plaintiff did not request time to file an amended complaint. The Court granted the motion and ordered Plaintiff to file its memorandum in support of joinder no later than 11/17/2025. On 11/16/2025, Plaintiff filed its memorandum in support of joinder. Plaintiff, however, still has not complied with the Court's 10/21/2025 order, because Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint that eliminates all improperly joined defendants. Accordingly, the Court orders Plaintiff to file an amended compl |
| 2025-12-31 | ANNUAL REMINDER: Pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 (Notification of Affiliates), any nongovernmental party, other than an individual or sole proprietorship, must file a statement identifying all its affiliates known to the party after diligent review or, if the party has identified no affiliates, then a statement reflecting that fact must be filed. An affiliate is defined as follows: any entity or individual owning, directly or indirectly (through ownership of one or more other entities), 5% or more of a party. The statement is to be electronically filed as a PDF in conjunction with entering the affiliates in CM/ECF as prompted. As a reminder to counsel, parties must supplement their statements of affiliates within thirty (30) days of any change in the information previously reported. This minute order is being issued to all counsel of record to remind counsel of their obligation to provide updated information as to additional affiliates if such updating is necessary. If counsel has any quest |
| 2025-11-17 | SUPPLEMENT to order on motion to seal document, order on motion for temporary restraining order, order on motion for leave to file excess pages, set deadlines, 12 |
| 2025-11-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama: For the reasons stated in the motion, the Court grants Plaintiff's motion for extension of time and leave to file a supplemental brief in support of joinder 13. Plaintiff is directed to file a supplemental memorandum in support of joinder on or before 11/17/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-11-03 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov for extension of time to file Memorandum in Support of Joinder |
| 2025-10-21 | ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Order, the Court dismisses this case without prejudice for misjoinder. By 11/3/2025, Plaintiff is directed to amend its complaint to eliminate all improperly joined defendants. If the amended complaint names more than one defendant, Plaintiff must simultaneously file a memorandum explaining why joinder of those defendants is proper. Plaintiff's motions to seal, 5, 11 ; motion for temporary restraining order 7 ; and motion for leave to file excess pages 10, are denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable Franklin U. Valderrama on 10/21/2025. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-09-22 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov Exhibit 2 to Declaration of Plaintiff |
| 2025-09-22 | RESPONSE by Leonid Afremovin Support of MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov for temporary restraining order 7 |
| 2025-09-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-09-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov to seal document sealed document 9 |
| 2025-09-22 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-09-10 | EMAILED Copyright report to Registrar, Washington DC |
| 2025-09-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov to seal document sealed document 2 |
| 2025-09-09 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Leonid Afremov by David Lee Gulbransen, Jr |
| 2025-09-09 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-09-09 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff Leonid Afremov Schedule A to Complaint |
| 2025-09-09 | COMPLAINT filed by Leonid Afremov; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-24034593. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
