1:25-cv-01102
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-06-10 | FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 6/10/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-06-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: No remaining defendant has responded to plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment. Accordingly, the motion 37 is granted. Based on the evidence previously submitted by plaintiff and the admission of liability by virtue of the default, plaintiff has established that a permanent injunction should be entered. The infringement of plaintiff's copyright and design patent irreparably harms plaintiff and confuses the public. This infringement was willful and statutory damages are awarded. After considering the nature of the products, the price point, the absence of any concrete evidence of lost profits or high-volume infringement by defendants (plaintiff has failed to seek an accounting of profits), the value of plaintiff's brand, and the need to deter infringement that is easily committed and difficult to stop, the Court concludes that $50,000 is an appropriate award of statutory damages for the copyright claims. Plaintiff has also ce |
| 2025-06-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion to strike 42 Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 41 is granted. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction 41 is stricken. Mailed notice |
| 2025-06-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pickuls Gizmo LLC to strike MOTION by Plaintiff Pickuls Gizmo LLC for preliminary injunction [41] |
| 2025-06-09 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pickuls Gizmo LLC for preliminary injunction |
| 2025-05-30 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff Pickuls Gizmo LLC regarding terminate hearings, set/reset hearings, 39 |
| 2025-05-30 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 37 for entry of default and default judgment against all remaining defendants. All remaining defendants have failed either to plead or to otherwise appear to defend against this action. Accordingly, an order of default is entered under Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Any objections to the motion for entry of default judgment must be filed on or before 6/6/2025. If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 6/6/2025. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing as a separate entry on the docket. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all remaining defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. A tentative default judgment hearing is set for 6/12/2025 |
| 2025-05-29 | MEMORANDUM by Pickuls Gizmo LLC in support of motion for default judgment[37] |
| 2025-05-29 | MOTION by Plaintiff Pickuls Gizmo LLC for default judgment as to Defendants listed on Schedule A |
| 2025-05-27 | STATUS Report by Pickuls Gizmo LLC |
| 2025-05-22 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Summons was issued on 4/17/2025, and Defendants' responses to the complaint were due by 5/8/2025. Plaintiff should file any motion for entry of default and default judgment by 5/29/2025. If there are any remaining defendants whom default and default judgment are not being sought, Plaintiff is ordered to identify each defendant against whom this case is proceeding and state whether the parties anticipate a settlement or further litigation in the status report due 5/28/2025. A telephone status hearing is set for 6/5/2025 at 9:15 a.m. The call-in number is (855) 244-8681 and the access code is 172 628 1276##. Attorneys of record may not use speakerphones during the status hearing. Members of the public and media will be able to call in to listen to this hearing but will be placed on mute. Persons granted remote access to proceedings are reminded of the general prohibition against photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proc |
| 2025-05-20 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pickuls Gizmo LLC as to Shop1103329268 Store on 4/17/2025, answer due 5/8/2025; Shop1103330226 Store on 4/17/2025, answer due 5/8/2025. |
| 2025-04-17 | [封存] SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendants |
| 2025-04-16 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff Pickuls Gizmo LLC |
| 2025-04-16 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 4/16/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-04-16 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction [25] is granted. Plaintiff's filings establish that it has acted expeditiously to protect its interests and that there remains a significant risk defendants will transfer relevant assets beyond the Court's reach. For these reasons, as well as the reasons provided in the whole of plaintiff's filings and as stated by the Court in connection with entry of the TRO, the Court is persuaded that plaintiff has satisfied the requirements for a preliminary injunction. In addition, the Court finds that the balance of harms favors plaintiff and that a preliminary injunction serves the public interest by, among other things, protecting consumers from the marketing of counterfeit goods. Plaintiff has also certified and established [29] that it provided electronic notice to defendants of the pendency of this action and the motion, but no objection to the motion for a preliminary injunction has been fil |
| 2025-04-10 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff PG, Ltd regarding terminate deadlines, set/reset hearings, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings, 28 |
| 2025-04-10 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Before the Court is plaintiff's motion 25 for entry of a preliminary injunction. In connection with that motion, plaintiff must serve all defendants with the following statement: "The Court has taken the motion for a preliminary injunction under advisement and will consider the motion unopposed if no defendant appears and objects by 4/15/2025." If no objections are filed by that date, the Court will consider the motion unopposed. The Court will also rule on the papers unless a hearing is requested by 4/15/2025. A hearing, to be conducted via teleconferencing, may be requested by filing a Request for Hearing. Plaintiff must serve this minute order upon all defendants within one business day of its entry on the docket and must promptly file proof of that service. A tentative preliminary injunction hearing is set for 4/17/2025 at 9:15 a.m. Plaintiff need not file the status report due 4/16/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-04-10 | CERTIFICATE of Service by Plaintiff PG, Ltd regarding memorandum in support of motion 26, MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd for preliminary injunction 25 |
| 2025-04-10 | MEMORANDUM by PG, Ltd in support of motion for preliminary injunction 25 |
| 2025-04-10 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd for preliminary injunction |
| 2025-04-09 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: By 4/16/2025, Plaintiff shall file a status report with an update on the case. Mailed notice. |
| 2025-04-08 | SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) Shop1103330226 Store by Plaintiff PG, Ltd |
| 2025-04-08 | [封存] SUMMONS Submitted (Court Participant) for defendant(s) by Plaintiff PG, Ltd |
| 2025-03-26 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's ex parte second motion 19 to extend the temporary restraining order seeks to extend the sealed TRO entered on 3/4/2025 to maintain the status quo by an additional period of 14 days until 4/15/2025. Rule 65 dictates that a temporary restraining order cannot exceed 14 days, although the court may extend it "for a like period" for good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2). On 3/12/2025, this Court extended the TRO an additional 14 days until 4/1/2025. Doc. 18. Plaintiff's current request exceeds the maximum 28-day limit for a TRO. If a TRO extension exceeds the maximum duration for a TRO under Rule 65(b), the extension "becomes in effect a preliminary injunction that is appealable, but the order remains effective." H-D Mich., LLC v. Hellenic Duty Free Shops S.A., 694 F.3d 827, 844 (7th Cir. 2012). A preliminary injunction requires notification to the opposing party. See Fed. R. Civ. 65(a)(1) (a "court may issue a preliminary injun |
| 2025-03-25 | NOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief[19] before Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 4/1/2025 at 09:15 AM. |
| 2025-03-25 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd Second Motion to Extend Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2025-03-12 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's ex parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order 17 is granted. For the reasons stated in Plaintiff's Motion, the Court finds good cause to extend the temporary restraining order an additional 14 days to 4/1/2025. Plaintiff shall file a preliminary injunction motion if appropriate no later than 3/25/2025. Telephone status hearing set for 3/18/2025 is stricken and reset to 4/1/2025 at 9:15 a.m. Mailed notice |
| 2025-03-11 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd for Extension of Temporary Restraining Order |
| 2025-03-06 | SURETY BOND in the amount of $ 2,000.00 posted by PG, Ltd. (Document not imaged) (Received at the Intake Counter on 3/6/25) |
| 2025-03-04 | [封存] Sealed Temporary Restraining Order Signed by the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani on 3/4/2025. Mailed notice |
| 2025-03-04 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff has filed a Memorandum [13] establishing joinder as directed. At this preliminary stage and in the absence of adversarial presentation, the Court finds that joinder of two defendants is proper at this time and this case may now proceed. Plaintiff has submitted evidence showing that the two defendant stores are owned by the same company. Doc. 13-1, 2; Doc. 13-2. Moreover, unlike Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020), defendants in this case use an identical product title and each listing contains the same five pictures. Doc. 8-5. Plaintiff's motions for leave to file under seal [4, 12], motion to increase page limit [7], and ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, including a temporary injunction, a temporary asset restraint, expedited discovery, and alternative service [8] are granted. Plaintiff's submissions establish that, were defendants to learn of these proceedings before the execution of plaintiff's |
| 2025-02-13 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PG, Ltd Memorandum In Support of Joinder |
| 2025-02-13 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd for leave to file Documents Under Seal |
| 2025-02-10 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PG, Ltd by Ying Chen |
| 2025-02-10 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PG, Ltd by Zareefa Burki Flener |
| 2025-02-05 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sunil R. Harjani: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file under seal 4, plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order 8, and plaintiff's motion to increase page limit 7 are entered and continued. Upon review of the complaint and the TRO submissions, the Court sua sponte raises the proprietary of joinder of two defendants in this case. See, e.g., Estee Lauder Cosmetics Ltd. v. Schedule A, 334 F.R.D. 182 (N.D. Ill. 2020). By 2/13/2025, plaintiff shall file a supplemental memorandum addressing the propriety of joinder in light of the principles described in Estee Lauder and explaining specifically why the defendants are properly joined. In the alternative, plaintiff has leave to file an amended complaint with a single defendant. Estee Lauder, 334 F.R.D. at 189. Mailed notice |
| 2025-02-04 | [封存] SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd |
| 2025-02-04 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-02-04 | NOTIFICATION of Affiliates pursuant to Local Rule 3.2 by PG, Ltd |
| 2025-01-31 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PG, Ltd Unredacted Complaint |
| 2025-01-31 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG, Ltd for leave to file Documents Under Seal |
| 2025-01-31 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PG, Ltd by James Edward Judge |
| 2025-01-31 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-01-31 | COMPLAINT filed by PG, Ltd; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23031730. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
