1:25-cv-05330
| 日期 | 描述 |
|---|---|
| 2025-07-25 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and Plaintiff's notice of voluntary dismissal [23] this action is being dismissed without prejudice. All pending motions and deadlines are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (gel,) |
| 2025-07-24 | NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by PG Ltd., as to Defendant Shenzhen Lindsay Technology Co., Ltd. |
| 2025-07-02 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file excess pages 17 is granted. However, Plaintiff's renewed motion for TRO 18 is denied without prejudice. In order to be entitled to equitable relief, like a TRO, Plaintiff must show (among other things) that there is ongoing or impending harm. Swanigan v. City of Chicago, 881 F.3d 577, 583 n.2 (7th Cir. 2018). The evidence submitted in this case supports allegations of infringement in early January 2025 11, which, in this Court's view, is too old to support a finding of ongoing harm at this time. To the extent a renewed motion is filed, Plaintiff must include either recent evidence of infringement, or a live link that the Court can click on that would demonstrate ongoing harm. Last, the Court has admonished counsel regarding compliance with this Court's case management procedures 6 15. Namely, Plaintiff's counsel previously failed to file a notice of presentment for a motion 6 and failed to notice o |
| 2025-07-01 | NOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages[17], Sealed motion[18], motion for leave to file[16] before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 7/8/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-07-01 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., to strike notice of motion[19] Improperly Formatted Document |
| 2025-06-30 | NOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of |
| 2025-06-30 | [封存] SEALED MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., RENEWED MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER |
| 2025-06-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-06-30 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., for leave to file Documents Under Seal |
| 2025-06-23 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: The Court previously entered an order [6] questioning whether Plaintiff had met its burden of establishing that permissive joinder of 179 Defendants in this case was proper under 35 U.S.C. §299. Plaintiff was granted leave to file either a supplemental memorandum or an amended Schedule A consistent with that ruling. In response, Plaintiff filed the Second Declaration of James E. Judge in Support of Joinder [12], arguing that joinder is proper for these 40 Defendants because they "use the same shipping address" for their products (which Plaintiff has ordered). Plaintiff presumably contends that such similarities support its conclusory allegation that Defendants' actions arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, but the Court remains unconvinced. See Tang v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23 C 4587, 2024 WL 68332, at *2 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 4, 2024) (fin |
| 2025-06-20 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., for leave to file excess pages |
| 2025-06-20 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., for leave to file documents under seal |
| 2025-06-20 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PG Ltd., Amended Schedule A to the Complaint |
| 2025-06-20 | NOTICE of Motion by James Edward Judge for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages[9], motion for leave to file[8], motion for temporary restraining order[10] before Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt on 6/26/2025 at 10:00 AM. |
| 2025-06-20 | [封存] SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PG Ltd., Ex.1 to Second Declaration of James E. Judge [12] |
| 2025-06-20 | DECLARATION of James E. Judge regarding order on motion for leave to file, text entry, [6] Second Declaration of James E. Judge in Support of Joinder |
| 2025-06-20 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PG Ltd., Ex2 Pt.1 to Declaration of Kawsar Miah |
| 2025-06-20 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., for temporary restraining order |
| 2025-06-18 | MINUTE entry before the Honorable LaShonda A. Hunt: Plaintiff names 179 Defendants in this single case. However, after reviewing the complaint [1] [5] and other filings, the Court questions whether Plaintiff has established sufficient grounds for joinder of all Defendants. See 35 U.S.C. § 299; Tang v. Partnerships & Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, No. 23 C 4587, 2024 WL 68332, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 4, 2024) ("accused infringers may not be joined in one action as defendants. based solely on allegations that they each have infringed the patent or patents in suit."). By 7/2/25, Plaintiff must either (a) file a supplemental memorandum that refers to specific facts alleged in its filings and provides citations to specific screenshots associated with each Schedule A Defendant to demonstrate that joinder is proper; or (b) file under seal an amended Schedule A with a subset of Defendants, along with an amended declaration that explains how each of these Defendants is prop |
| 2025-05-14 | SEALED DOCUMENT by Plaintiff PG Ltd., Unredacted Complaint |
| 2025-05-14 | MOTION by Plaintiff PG Ltd., for leave to file Documents Under Seal |
| 2025-05-14 | ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff PG Ltd., by James Edward Judge |
| 2025-05-14 | CIVIL Cover Sheet |
| 2025-05-14 | COMPLAINT filed by PG Ltd.,; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-23484098. |
先核对信息，再决定下一步
请以案号、法院、立案日期与 docket 记录交叉确认。页面展示的是公开信息汇总，不等同于法院对侵权、TRO 是否签发或资金状态的认定。
